Joshua 11:7 - 11 "At that time Joshua
turned back and captured
Hazor and put its king to the sword. (Hazor had been
the head of all these kingdoms.) Everyone in it they
put to the sword. They totally destroyed them, not
sparing anything that breathed, and he burned up
Hazor itself."
In this way, the Bible tells of the destruction of one of the greatest
cities in the Jordan Valley. But, did the city actually fall violently
to the Israelites at the end of the Bronze Age? The Bible is the
only document in history that makes mention of the fall of Hazor, so any
comparisons that could be made is out of the question. Therefore, we only
have archaeology to look to for answers.
In the magazine Biblical Archaeology Review May/June
1999 vol 25. no. 3 p. 22 - 39, they discuss the the fate of the city and
any possible culprits.
"A fierce conflagration marked the end of
Canaanite Hazor.", so states the article
right from the start. It goes on to tell of the damage sustainted
by the city......a city-wide layer of ash and charred wood, sometimes as
much as 3 feet thick, attests to the intensity of the destructive fire.
Basalt rock slabs were cracked from intense heat in one of the palaces
and clay vessels were found simply melted where they stood.
Large rock statues of Canaanite deities were found chiseled and marred.
Some of the statues were even found with their heads and arms still laying
on the ground behind them.....the chisel marks clearly ringing the necks
and heads.
Would it be possible that the Israelites could have done this?
The magazine places the time of the destruction in the late Bronze Age
or from the 15th to the 13th century BC. Which as you recall from my page
on the Exodus, was the exact time the Hebrews left Egypt and conquered
Canaan. The last official record of the exsistance of Hazor is by the Egyptian
Pharoah Seti I (1291 - 1278 BC) in an account
of conquest against the Canaanite cities in about 1290 BC as well
as being mentioned in the Amarnu letters of the Pharoah
Akhenaten in the 14th century BC.
Joshua 11 : 13 "Yet Israel did not burn any of the cities
built on their
mounds - except Hazor, which Joshua burned."
The Bibles seems to give us a problem here since the evidence from the
region tells us that all of the Late Bronze Age cities in Canaan have evidence
of firey deaths. Only Hazor has a level of charring and ash that makes
the other cities look like matches next to a bonfire. So therefore, the
Bible and the Israelites must have had the memory of this intense blaze
imprinted on their minds as to only recall Hazor's fire specifically.
The aforementioned magazine looks at the evidence and asks who are the
most likely to have done this large scale destruction? They mention 4 groups
that could have put Hazor to the torch......
1) The
Sea Peoples - Hazor is situated far from the
coast and would not give any stratigic value to the Sea Peoples,
also they are not known to ever have attacked this far inland.
2) The
Egyptians AND/OR 3) Other
Canaanite Cities - The mutilation of
both Canaanite and Egyptian gods' statues would be unthinkable to either
of these groups because they shared the same gods. So if they angered Hazor's
gods, then they would be angering their own as well.
4) The
Israelites - these are the only ones who seem
to be able to attack and destroy Hazor in the Late Bronze Age. Also, the
Hebrews are known to destroy and mutilate Canaanite gods when in a uproar.
Back
to the Main Page
Back to the Exodus Page
Goto
A Graph of Evidence