Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Capa-Alek (1-5)

Home Up


   Thanks for stopping by at my big Angel-Fire site!!!    .................    Be sure to check back often.   ..........   Drop me a line and tell me what you think!!    ...............................  >> 

  Click HERE to go see some really cool chess cartoons and graphics!  (Maybe put some on your own web-site!!)

 Click  HERE  if you want to purchase a chess book ... or other chess stuff. 
  (Tell them where you found this link.) 


Jose R. Capablanca (2775) - Alexander A. Alekhine (2745) 

[D52]

World Championship Match in Buenos Aires, 
Argentina. (Game # 11), 1927.



So far we have looked at the moves:
1. d4, d5; 2. c4, e6; 3. Nc3, Nf6; 4. Bg5, Nbd7; 5. e3, c6; 6. Nf3, Qa5; ('!')
7. Nd2, Bb4; 8. Qc2, dxc4; 9. Bxf6, Nxf6; 10. Nxc4, Qc7; 11. a3!, Be7; 

12. Be2, 0-0; 13. 0-0, Bd7; 14. b4, b6; 15. Bf3, Rac8; 16. Rfd1, Rfd8; 
17. Rac1, Be8; 18. g3, Nd5; 19. Nb2!?, Qb8; 20. Nd3, Bg5!;
21. Rb1, Qb7; 22. e4!?,


22...Nxc3; 23. Qxc3 Qe7;

  Black just played 23...Qe7.  Sometimes its important to understand the "trends and drifts" of a game.   Do you know what I mean when I say this?
(Game position after 23...Qe7.)

***

24. h4 Bh6; 25. Ne5 g6[];  ("Box," or "only move.")

 

  Black just pushed his King-Knight's Pawn forward one square. Why was this move necessary? Why isn't Black concerned with the weakening of his King-side?

(Actual game position after 25...g6.)

***

"Forced," - according to Capablanca. (If the threat is not soon met, 
then White will play Ng4 and Nxh6, defacing Black's pawn structure. 
So then ...g6; is forced to give Black's Bishop an escape square.

[ 25...f6?; 26. Ng4 Bf7; 27. Nxh6+ gxh6; 28.Qe3, ("+/") or ("+/-") ] 

***

 26. Ng4 Bg7; 27. e5!?,

  White just pushed his KP to e5 on his 27th move. What is the point of this move?
(Game position after White played 27. e5.)

***

White is attempting to follow-through on his plan of occupying the 
f6-square with his knight. The problem with e5, is that it leaves White 
with a backward d-pawn, and his pawns are also completely immobile.


<< [ Some alternatives to 27. e5!?, are: 
27. Rbc1!?;
or 27. Bg2!?; or 27. Qe3.

( After 27. Qe3, we analyze further: )

27... h5; 28. Nh2 e5; 29. d5,

( Maybe better is: 29. dxe5! "+/=" 
and perhaps White has a small advantage. )

29...cxd5; 30. exd5 Bd7; 31. Nf1 Ba4; 32. Rdc1 Bc2; 
33. Rb2 Bf5; 34. Rxc8 Rxc8; 35. Nd2 Rc1+; 36. Kh2 e4; 
37. Rb3 Be5;
 38. Kg2!, Bxg3;

***

 ... or Black can play: 38...exf3+!?; 39. Nxf3, 
(Now White has a nice double attack.)  39 ... Rd1; 
(There was no way to save the Black Rook 
at c1 and the Black Bishop on e5.)
40. Qxe5 Qxe5; 41. Nxe5 Be4+; 42. f3 Rxd5; 43. Nc4 Rd4;
("=")

***
(We now return to the main analysis line that began with  27. Qe3.) 
39. fxg3 exf3+;  40. Nxf3 Rc2+;  41. Kg1 Qd7;  
42. Nd4 Ra2;  43. Qe5,

  (Game analysis diagram.)  The position after 43. Qe5.  The correct evaluation is about equal. Neither side has enough King Safety to come close to winning.
(The position in our analysis after 43. Qe5. The position is equal.) 

***

The position is very close to equal. (Original analysis.) {A.J.G.} ] >>


27...h5; 28. Ne3 c5; (!?)

 

  "Black just played ...c5!, counter-attacking White's center." says Life-Master A.J.

(Actual game position after Black plays 28...c5.)

***

'!' - Black's 28th move is best, according to Capablanca
Black vigorously attacks White's center. {A.J.G.}

***

29. bxc5?!,   Maybe - '?' 

 

  White just captured towards the center, perhaps relying on principle. But here the move was incorrect. Can you figure out why this capture was inaccurate?

(The actual position after 29. bxc5?)

***

The first really bad move. This is clearly inferior to 29. dxc5. But Capa 
is playing to anchor a pawn on f6.   Capa himself    pointed out this 
move was bad,  but  MANY (!) annotators have missed that fact.  
This is indeed the turning point of the game. After this move, I strongly 
doubt White has any real advantage.

***

 

***

Normally  you capture towards the center, but White should 
instead play: 29. dxc5! bxc5; 30. b5,
("+/=")

  A position from our analysis after 30. b5.  "Who is better?"  "Why?"
(The analysis position after 30. b5.)

***

which ... "is better than the game continuation."  - Capablanca.
(White is clearly just a little better here.)
One of the key points here is in this position, White wins a pure 
K+P ending hands down!
  After 29. bxc5?; 
Black may be winning the K+P ending. 

***

 

(Now back to the actual game.)

29...bxc5; 30. d5,

   Game Diagram. The actual position from the game after 30. d5.  " What is the plan behind White's 30th move? " asks Life-Master A.J.

(Actual Game position after White plays 30. d5.)

***

White wanted to play this move, probably thinking it would lead to 
an advantage for him. Capa remarked that this move was forced.

 

 

***
[ Terrible is: 30. dxc5? Rxd1+; 31. Rxd1 Rxc5;
("-/+") {A.J.G.} ]

***

 

 

30...exd5; 
(Forced.) Black could not allow White's 
d-pawn to advance any further.

 

31. Nxd5 Qe6;

  Black just played 31...Qe6.  (It looks like White might be slowly getting the better game. But looks CAN be deceiving!)

(Actual game position after 31...Qe6.)

***

< White based his entire strategy on getting the Knight to f6. 
Black would then be forced to swap, leaving a pawn on f6. 
White thought this pawn on f6 would guarantee him an 
advantage. The idea fails, but not by much. >  {A.J.G.}

***

After I wrote the above words, I searched the database 
of Capa's games, and there is no other games that Capa 
did not win easily in a similar position.

***
Think about it!!

***
Capa's experience told him that every time he had a pawn on f6, 
he won easily. Why should this game be any different? We also 
have to remember how far chess theory has advanced since this 
game was played. Perhaps I was too harsh on the great Cuban. {A.J.G.}

***

 

***

[ Not 31...Qxe5?; (or '??') 32. Qxe5 Bxe5; 
33. Ne7+ Kg7; 34. Nxc8, and "White is winning."
("+/-") ]

***

Click on the "Next Button" below, to go to the 
next page of this great game.


  Copyright (c) {LM} A.J. Goldsby I 

  Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby, 1995-2008
  Copyright © A.J. Goldsby, 2009.  All rights reserved.  


Back Home Up Next