THE UFO RESOURCE CENTER offers complete coverage on the Court battle between the Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) and the Department of Defence (DoD. We feature these news posts in chronological order, listed in a bulleted list, in order from the oldest to the latest posts that we have received from our world wide newsgroups.
UFORCE thanks CAUS lawyer Peter Gersten (UFOLAWYER1@aol.com)for this CAUS update
Delivered-To: uforc@wa.freei.net From: UFOLAWYER1@aol.com Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 10:42:08 EDT Subject: CAUS ANNOUNCEMENTS: April 8, 2000
CAUS has decided to go forward with an appeal of Judge McNamee's decision...provided it can raise $10,000 by May 15th. CAUS believes the Judge's statement that "by including extra search terms in the computer index query and by excluding the specific eyewitness accounts, sketches, and time and place restrictions in the electronic mail message, Defendant has broadened the parameters of its search," is a legitimate appealable issue. CAUS believes Judge McNamee abused his discretion by 1) drawing the conclusion the additional keywords broadened the parameters of the computerized search and 2) concluding that the eyewitness accounts, sketches, times and places, if included in the electronic mail messages, would have limited the DoD's search, since neither conclusion is supported by DoD affidavits. No where in the "record" is there any indication of the search techniques used in the computerized search or the logic in not supplying all the information to DARPA employees. 2) New FOIA Request To save time, on Thursday, April 6th, I called the General Counsel's Office for both DARPA and the Joint Staff to inquire about obtaining any of the responses to the e-mail sent to the 200 DARPA employees and the results of the computerized search of the JCS with the keywords. Though neither attorney was available, I left a message and was assured that I would be receiving a call back. Needless to say, I have not received any calls from the DoD. Thus I will now go through the formal procedure of a new FOIA request for these responses, the search techniques used, information about the Defense and Space Operation Division, and of CAUS, DoD's case file on the CAUS request. (Reference #1).
Delivered-To: uforc@wa.freei.net From: ParaNormlNews@aol.com Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:30:29 EDT Subject: P3N NEWs FLASH: CAUS SEEKs to APPEAL JUDGE's DECISION To: CAUS-L@caus.org "Don't be a marshmallow. Walk the street with us into history. Get off the sidewalk. Stop being vegetables. Work for Justice. Viva the boycott!" --Dolores Huerta (1930-____) US Chicana activist, labor leader!THE UFO RESOURCE CENTER asks that you give CAUS your full financial support at this crucial juncture in this battle against government secrecy and UFOs.<=============================================> Contents: 1) Judge McNamee's Decision Now Posted 2) CAUS Finds Reason to Appeal 3) CAUS Needs to Raise $10,000 by May 30th 4) WWUFORC Pledges to Match CAUS Appeal Fund 5) CAUS Member Offers Support <=============================================> JUDGE McNAMEE's RULING: Now on CAUS Web Site: http://caus.org/home.html <=============================================> CAUS FINDs REASON to APPEAL: Viva the Appeal! CAUS believes the Judge's statement that "by including extra search terms in the computer index query and by excluding the specific eyewitness accounts, sketches, and time and place restrictions in the electronic mail message, Defendant has broadened the parameters of its search," is a legitimate appealable issue. CAUS believes Judge McNamee abused his discretion by 1) drawing the conclusion the additional keywords broadened the parameters of the computerized search and 2) concluding that the eyewitness accounts, sketches, times and places, if included in the electronic mail messages, would have limited the DoD's search, since neither conclusion is supported by DoD affidavits. No where in the "record" is there any indication of the search techniques used in the computerized search or the logic in not supplying all the information to DARPA employees. <=============================================> CAUS HAS UNTIL MAY 30th to RAISE $10,000: CAUS has decided to go forward with an appeal of Judge McNamee's decision...provided it can raise $10,000 by the May 30th filing deadline. CAUS will not give up. CAUS v. DoD has lasted longer than any other UFO/FOIA case. After all these months, there is no reason to stop now and a good reason to continue. The Judge's conclusion that the added search terms and the elimination of certain descriptions by the DoD, in effect, expanded the search parameters, is NOT supported in the record. Prying UFO information out of the government's clenched fist is almost impossible unless you have the right tools...the right legal tools. CAUS is that legal tool, that cold hard unbendable legal crowbar. But legal tools have it's costs...especially federal appeals. CAUS has esytablished an Emergency Appeal Fund. The filing deadline is May 30th. CAUS cannot appeal without your support. CAUS has yet another opportunity to argue against government secrecy and for our right to know the truth, in open court. This time, before three Judges at the United States Court of Appeals in San Francisco...three men in black robes. That alone should be incentive to send in your contribution. CAUS is ready to fight...to continue in court...but it needs your help. We must continue to capture national attention. As soon as you can, send CAUS (at the address listed below) your support contributions $5 $50 $100...+ Remember, the filing deadline is May 30th. <=============================================> WWUFORC To MATCH FUNDS for CAUS APPEAL: The World Wide UFO Reporting Center has offered to donate partially matching funds for every dollar donated to CAUS for its upcoming appeal of the federal court's recent decision in Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) v. Department of Defense (DoD). Because we believe the Judge's finding was improper and unjust we are hoping to assist the efforts of CAUS in appealing the case. Besides offering to pay the filing fees, additionally, for every dollar donated to CAUS for the appeals process, an additional 5% will be donated by the World Wide UFO Reporting Center. WWUFORC is a free to join, internet based UFO research and reporting center which can be found at www.ufosightings.net <=============================================> MEMBER SUPPORT for APPEAL: From: David and Linda Z. Atlanta, GA. "You could call us ex-hippies in our middle class fifties. We grew up believing in a proverbial good, well intentioned government. We still hold this belief but we do feel there are individuals in the government who should be taken out and shot...specifically the ones who decide we can't accept shocking information without us making in our pants. We don't know if there is contact. We do know there is a broad cover-upof somthing. It's beyond obvious. Only an experienced prosecutor/lawyer can get to and pry open and peer into this governments legal engine...& I only know one smart lawyer who has the history of dedication to pry open this government avowed UFO Pandoras Box...that's why we are contributing $50 for the CAUS appeal." <=============================================> © Copyright 2000 ParaNorml News Network. P3N is a registered service mark of the ParaNorml News Network. All Rights Reserved.(Reference #2)
P3N SPECIAL REPORT: CAUS LOOKs to APPEAL JUDGE's RULING
<=============================================>
Return-Path:AS YOU CAN SEE, CAUS has its detractors. People are listening; but are they willing to support our efforrts to protect the world from UFO Secrecty. ARE YOU tired of being spoon fed the "same old baloney" day after day? Join the Force! UFORCE!Delivered-To: uforc@wa.freei.net Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 01:04:18 EDT Subject: CAUS COMMENTARY: Pro Bono CAUS COMMENTARY: Pro Bono Today I received the following e-mail from a concerned member: "I would like to contribute some money to the cause (no pun intended), but I need to know why you need $10,000. It seems like an awful lot of money, especially since I'm under the assumption that your legal representation of CAUS is pro bono. I know there are costs such as filing fees, photocopying, transcription of depositions, etc., but I just can't seem to wrap that around a number like $10,000. I'm sure I'm not the only person who has this question, and I have a feeling that your contribution rate has been so pitiful because those who do have questions won't just ask for clarification (like I am now.) Could you please provide a breakdown of your projected costs for the appeal?" --Jennelle Mihalovits Well Jennelle, its pretty simple. I run CAUS 7 days a week and at least 10 hours a day...pro bono. I prepare, research, file, and argue CAUS lawsuits...pro bono. I send out daily CAUS e-mails...pro bono. I post 3 articles a day on the CAUS web site...pro bono. But I refuse to do appeals pro bono. I believe that expense, including a legal fee, should be exclusively funded by others who also believe, as I do...in learning the truth. And I suggest that anyone who feels the $10,000 amount, including all expenses, is excessive, should call a few attorneys in his/her area and see what the going rate for a federal appeal is. I have no 'need' to file this appeal. Actually, maybe I should be devoting more time in pusuing non-UFO clients instead of CAUS. NOT! Since January, 1998 when I resurrected CAUS, there have been about 500 people who have contributed their time, talent and money to help me in my mission to end the secrecy surrounding our contact with a non-human intelligence. Unfortunately, that figure is less than 5% of the total CAUS membership during that same period. The vast majority of the CAUS membership has not supported the gift shop...maybe they are ashamed to wear a CAUS T-shirt or fear ridicule in displaying a CAUS bumper sticker. The "Dollar-a-Month Club" was an idea whose time never did come....except for a few loyal supporters. The Court Transcript would be, I thought, the perfect way for members to support a principle they believed in, while possessing a legal artifact of the organization that represented that principle. It was also part of ufological history. Only 27 people purchased the transcript. But then again, I guess I should have simply distribtuted them...pro bono. I also received this e-mail today: "Dear Friends/Relatives, I feel compelled to communicate with you regarding this (CAUS) request for help. This is a very worthy consideration and as we all know (unfortunately) legal processes in this country ALWAYS have a price tag attached! I believe the CAUS goal to be obtainable and we American citizens must indicate (in all ways possible) that we're fed up to the gills with a half century of secrecy and denial. Whether the UFO/Alien phenomenon turns out to be of a tangible/mundane nature or of a spiritual nature, I believe it behooves us to strive for total disclosure. I have helped Peter Gersten (CAUS) in the past and I ask that you strongly consider doing the same. 'For the want of a nail the shoe was lost,' etc., etc., etc." --Don Hirth And this one: "I sent via mail today a check for $100 for the CAUSe. I'm not certain the 9th Circuit will make the landmark decision many of us hope, but a mere $10,000 is a small price to pay to keep up the pressure. On the other hand, if the 9th upholds McNamee's decision, remember that it's the most overturned federal appeals court in the country! Perhaps the radio show circuit and publicity will help reach the May goal." --Sally J.S., Alaska Well, folks...there you have it. If you want me to do the appeal...then you will have to help me raise that amount. No pro bono on this one. I would love to argue before the three black-robed judges in San Francisco with all of you there...but I am sure I can find something else to do that is more agreeable to the other 95% of CAUS who prefer that I do it...pro bono. And for all those 18 people who have supported the appeal so far...thanks. Peter A. Gersten Director (Reference #1, OpCit)
Delivered-To: uforc@wa.freei.net From: UFOLAWYER1@aol.com Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 23:11:11 EDT Subject: CAUS COMMENTARY: Members Respond to Pro Bono CAUS COMMENTARY: MEMBERs RESPOND to Pro Bono Some CAUS members bring out the best in me..or the worst. Maybe I am just warming up for the U.S. Court of Appeals. The Universe acts in strange ways. Below are a few of the e-mails I received in response to my "Pro bono" commentary. Following each e-mail is my response. If any of my responses offend any of you, so be it. I do not do what I do to win friends and influence people. I do it to learn the truth and end the secrecy...whether CAUS members support me or not. No Judge has ever complained about my "attitude" in Court. No other lawyer does what I do. I wonder why? If you want pleasantries...watch Mr. Rogers. And now the e-mails: In a message dated 04/16/2000 6:38:01 AM US Mountain Standard Time, J.C. writes: "I have another reason why people are not contributing to the $10,000 appeals process. Perhaps they think, including myself, that it is a waste of time and money." CAUS: That's kewl...but the question is whether you support my judgment and desire to file the appeal. If you do not, then I ask that you unsubscribe from the CAUS mailing list and not take advantage of the information on the CAUS web site. I do not do what I do to entertain people, I do it to learn the truth. And if my own members will not support my judgment, then all I ask is for them not to be hypocritical and use the efforts of my labors. I am not asking for much....considering what I give in return. In a message dated 04/16/2000 7:15:00 AM US Mountain Standard Time, J.S. writes: "But whatever it takes to get the issue in the face of apathy is a reward in itself, is warranted. And that we have an advocate of your skill and motivation is not only lucky for people of our like attitudes, it is good for humanity at large." CAUS: Exactly the point. If we can get the Court of Appeals to remand the case back to the District Court for further clarification of the search parameters, we have achieved another victory...even if we do not get any information. The idea is to get the attention of the national media and thereby the public at large. And can you imagine the coverage at the U.S. Court of Appeals. We must exhaust all our legal remedies but we can justify any future, non-judicial, CAUS of action. In a message dated 04/16/2000 1:13:46 PM US Mountain Standard Time, D.T.writes: "This isn't intended as a criticism of you at all. I hope you'll find this helpful. I think, like many others, I was thinking about sending in a modest amount, but was turned off by the negative tone of the last few messages." CAUS: Why is it that it always the people that are "thinking" of donating that are turned off by my attitude? I bet about 8000 of the CAUS members "think" about donating. How come no one objects to my attitude when I file a lawsuit or argue in Court or on receipt of the free e-mails or when they go to the CAUS web site. Maybe I have this attitude beCAUS less than 5% of my members support the CAUS. Maybe I have this attitude beCAUS it keeps me going after 25 years of frustration. With that said, I do appreciate all your suggestions. But since I am only one person I do not have time to put together a successful fundraising campaign. So I do what I do and say what I say. What you see is what you get. But I will "think" about softening my attitude. In a message dated 04/16/2000 10:41:14 AM US Mountain Standard Time, G.M. writes: "I've snail mailed $50.00 to you the first time I read your appeal (pun intended) for funds for the appeal. You should be getting that check by Monday the latest. I do understand Jannelle's question as most people don't know what you go through. Your response should surely awaken many people and open their eyes. I too am surprised at the low amount collected thus far but hopefully that will increase exponentially as the days go by. I certainly feel that you should be compensated for the time you put into fighting for a caus that involves all of humanity not just those of us in the good old USA. Please keep up the good work in exposing as much information about UFO's as you can. Keep up the good work caus we need you." CAUS: Thanks George. It's ironic that if each person who receives the FREE CAUS e-mails sent in $1, I wouldn't need to resort to "begging" as one reader called it and then scolded me for it. And now my favorite e-mail of all time. There is simply not enough money to pay me for dealing with people like this: In a message dated 04/15/2000 8:48:03 PM US Mountain Standard Time, D.K. writes: "Its time to stop this. If you continue to pursue wasting taxpayers money on having to defend frivilous lawsuits, I will seriously consider filing a class action lawsuit against you. I am tired of crackpots such as yourself wasting the limited resources of our government institutions. They have more important things to do than having to put up with lunatics. These public disclosure lawsuits cost us taxpayers incredible amounts of money. Frankly, I believe that my hard earned tax dollars have better things to do than to pay to defend against your idiot lawsuits. Please stop this or you will find yourself the subject of litigation." I hope everyone had a wonderful weekend. Peter A. Gersten Director (Reference #1 IBID)
THIS ISSUE WILL NOT be resolved until the United States Government stops their campaign of dis-information, distortions and UFO cover-ups (read as="lies"). We are tired of it, this MUST STOP! It is time for the people of America to write their congressmen and senators, asking them to investigate the government conspiracy to hide the truth about the UFO enigma. THE TRUTH IS IN HERE!
In an email we received from CAUS dated 22 April, 2000; Peter states that the CAUS has filed another request for documents. In his email entitled "CAUS ANNOUNCEMENTS: Commentary; FOIA; ETH & Reality Check," he details the general apathy towards his appeal for funding and support. The following information was included in that e-mail:
NEW FOIA REQUEST SUBMITTED On Friday, April 21st, CAUS filed a new FOIA request with the Department of Defense for follow-up information on the lawsuit against the DoD.
Check out the CAUS web site and see what they stand for. Your support goes towards a worthy effort, to stop government secrecty concerning UFOs. Let's give them our full support!
_____________________________ REFERENCES:REFERENCE #1: Citizens Against UFO Secrecy; http://www.caus.org; 8624 E. San Bruno Drive EMail: caus@caus.org Scottsdale AZ 85248; Phone/Fax: (480)609-9120
About UFORCE!
_______________A WHITE KNIGHT PRODUCTION_______________
UFORCE Store: UFO Videos, Books, tapes, TV, Radio, appearances: click here