I got further observations via email:
"[..] the cost of doing a full-color coffee-table book would be prohibitively expensive, and [..] perhaps the only way of offsetting this would be to line up a list of "name" authors who might write essays, such as Mary Cantwell did in the New York Times several years back about "Holden Caulfield's New York." This might make publishers less jittery about the expense, but would still make it unlikely that any would take the chance, based purely on the risk/reward factor, not on anything to do with the merit of the project itself. (Such is the way the book industry functions.)"
- a literary agent and former editor"Whatever you decide to do, the time is now. There will never (probably) be more public interest and excitement [regarding] Salinger/his works than during the year of the 50th anniversary of Catcher."
- a book's editor
A look at the poll numbers: In comparison to the number of responses in the other polls I've done -- polls about the book itself -- the response here was tepid: the rate of responses is half (or less) of that of the other polls. Of those voting here, about half of them voted "may as well try." That response, to me, is lukewarm because it doesn't assess the idea. It is noncommittal, it is possibly is about opportunism and passive encouragement. To me, the numbers say that, of the people interested in the book enough to vote in polls, about 20% like the album book idea, about 10% don't, and the remainder (70%) either abstained or voted indifferently. Still, I have to note that a number of people thought it was a great idea and I know I'd like to have such an album book myself.
|
next: Presidential Election 2008
previous: Reasons to be Phony