~ COURTESY OF MSNBC ~
NEWS

~ INTERACTIVE ~
PROGRAM

- - - Click Here To View:
      

~ REMEMBERING ~
THE DARKEST DAY
IN AMERICA'S HISTORY
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

A
~ 911 Conspiracy ~
United States Could Have, Should Have Deployed Effective Counter measures -- Chronology, Intelligence and Common Sense

Late and ineffective scrambling was designed to convey image of a valiant attempt

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Looking at the chronology of events of September 11, 2001 and considering the Civil Defense capabilities of the United States' Military, reveals that there could and should have been a different outcome than what unfolded on that dark day.  Even given the most basic sources of information such as television live coverage and FAA monitoring, the military had enough intelligence at their disposal, which, combined with their response capabilities, should have enabled them to deter at least the plane that hit the Pentagon, if not also stopping the plane that hit the second World Trade Center tower.

Let's consider, as the representative example, the chronology provided at ABC News' website. (Reference.) 

8:28 a.m.: American Airlines Flight 11 makes an unexpected hard left turn, heading not toward Los Angeles, but over New York.  The transponder, which normally allows controllers to identify the plane, disappears.  Now it's just a blip on their radar screen.  A pilot leaves his radio microphone open. "That pilot was desperately trying to get word out that something was very, very wrong."

[~8:28 a.m.:] Within moments, air traffic controllers notice something is very wrong with United Flight 175. Instead of going west to California, it takes a U-turn over New Jersey and heads northeast to Manhattan's World Trade Center.

Here's the commentary in ABC's report on the chronology:

<QUOTE>
But, says ABCNEWS' John Miller, "There doesn't seem to have been alarm bells going off, traffic controllers getting on with law enforcement or the military. There's a gap there that will have to be investigated, but it's very doubtful you could have done anything anyway."
<END QUOTE>

A gap.  Let's look at their two assertions, which seem to have been the mantra of the day in regards to this question.

• (1) "there doesn't seem to have been alarm bells going off," 

and 

• (2) "it's very doubtful you could have done anything anyway."

Contrary to public statements by the federal government, the documented evidence is that (1) U.S. intelligence was well aware, even years in advance, of a terrorist plan to use airplanes as suicide missiles into key targets in the U.S. and elsewhere.

and (2)  given the Star-Wars-like technology of the defense department, they could have evoked any number of counter measures.

With these facts in mind, the above ABC quote seems more like intentional misinformation.  The believing American public takes them at their word on this.  However, the above two facts contradict the public statements.

Here comes the first plane.

8:45 a.m.: Flight 11 slams into the North Tower of the World Trade Center, hitting at about the 100th floor of the 110-story building.

What America doesn't know, but U.S. intelligence does, via the FAA for starters, is that there is at least one other planes in the air, off its designated course; and they probably had confirmation, beyond common sense suspicion, that this planes was headed to a similar fate.

As the intelligence information that morning unfolded, the military had sufficient cause, and had the capability to scramble jets to intercept these subsequent planes, ideally diverting them to a safe landing, and if that wasn't possible, to secondarily take them down well outside the range of highly populated centers.  At a minimum, they could have at least been on their tails, ready to take them out when their destinations became apparent and no alternatives were left.

9:03 a.m.: Eighteen minutes later, United Airlines Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower at about the 90th floor.

Later that morning, some scrambling attempts were made in the case of the Pennsylvania flight that crashed on the ground as well as the flight that hit the Pentagon.  But the planes came too late and could not catch up in time.  Were they deployed too late on purpose, so as to give the public the appearance of a valiant attempt?  Given their intelligence and capabilities, they could have been deployed much earlier, and could have averted at least the Pentagon attack, if not also the second tower hit earlier.

We have a historical precedent and a likely parallel to this scenario in the case of Pearl Harbor.  When the attack took place, the men fought valiantly despite the odds purposely stacked against them.  They did not go down without a fight.  As was finally reported in the mainstream press by the Discover channel recently, the pending Japanese attack was known in advance by President Roosevelt, and he calculated that allowing it to proceed would serve in the long-term interest of the nation to galvanize them to action, bringing them at long last into the war.  It had that effect.  America united behind the President, and through her determined muscle, the war was finally victoriously ended.

What is the purpose this time?

Even if the military was telling the public the truth in saying the attack caught them completely by surprise, the first plane's collision into the south tower of the WTC should have been more than ample intelligence (shown on televisions internationally within minutes) for the alarm bells of the military to kick into highest alert (if they weren't already), knowing as they did by then that one, two, then three other planes were also off course and probably all hijacked as well, having similar destinies intended.

At the time of the first collision, with knowledge of another rogue plane in the air, the military would have only needed seven minutes to fly a fighter jet at mach 2 into position from McGuire AFB in New Jersey to intercept the second plane that collided at 9:03 a.m.  They had twice the time needed, more than enough time, given the military's 24-7 constant alertness, to get pilots into the planes and off the ground and to the target.

9:30 a.m.: Someone aboard United Airlines Flight 93 from Newark to San Francisco tells controllers the pilot wants to change their flight plan.

9:43 a.m.: The horror arrives at the doorstep of the Pentagon, when American Flight 77 crashes into the west side of nation's military intelligence headquarters.

Beginning at least by 8:28 AM, U.S. Intelligence knew of two planes off course, which should have placed them on highest alert for the possibility of terrorist activities.  They had one hour and fifteen minutes to respond to the plane that ended up hitting the Pentagon.  They had intercept capabilities that they could have scrambled in a matter of minutes.  They didn't do it.  Why?

The fact that they did scramble some planes goes a long way in placating the general public that the military acted in good faith.  Hence the reason why this question has not been hot on the minds of the public.

When I called around to various news and government agencies to try and get some kind of official response to the question as to why there were not any effective countermeasures deployed, all I got was the run-around and blank stares on the phone.  No phone calls were returned from messages left on answering machines or with secretaries.  Not one.  I called the FBI, ABC, FAA, Department of Defense, the Pentagon, the State Department, MSNBC, Atlanta A.P., New York A.P., Washington A.P., House Armed Service Committee, Salt Lake Tribune, Deseret News and even the local sheriff, to try and cover the gamut of knowledge and insight.

When I asked the reporter at the Washington Associated Press office if I could quote him saying "we have no information on this matter," he requested an end to the conversation and referred me to the New York office, who had just referred me to the Washington office.  The only helpful information I received toward the end of the day was from a secretary at CBS who located three transcripts relevant to the subject, discussing the nearness of some military bases and the supposed difficulty of deploying planes.

My call to Senator Hatch's office, was probably the most representative of the sentiment held by Americans in general.  The secretary there said that she had carefully watched coverage throughout the day on September 11, including interviews with military and FAA personnel, who fielded questions as to what they had done or were doing in this whole process.  She said she was satisfied that the government had done everything they could and that the terrorists were able to penetrate notwithstanding, catching the entire country by surprise.

The fact that the U.S. had the military capability and sufficient  intelligence to act sooner and decisively is not known by the public, nor by this well-meaning yet ill-informed secretary.  Then again, we must give people a break for not questioning the information being given to them by the highest officials in the land.  Who wants to contemplate the ramifications of purposeful disinformation in this land of the free and home of the brave?

As was commented on the day of the attack and subsequently in the mainstream press, September 11 was indeed another Pearl Harbor.  It was staged specifically to arouse the public to bring the country into a war desired by the powers that be.  It worked, perhaps even better than those who planned it might have expected.  The citizens of the country have rallied in near unison around the President.  His mandate is strong and convincing. 

Time will tell what the powers that be want this war to accomplish.  Is it to eradicate terrorism, as they proclaim, or are their public statements cloud cover for darker motives, at least for some of them.

What the Americans do not realize, is that the most sinister enemies are not the terrorists, but are some of those within our own government, as well as those behind the scenes pulling the strings, who use events like this to promote their objective of establishing a world police state, one world government, governed by elites such as themselves, a money crash along with a cashless nation and total citizen disarmament.

America, Christians, when will you awaken?

Sometimes, The Greatest Enemies Are within, Not without.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - click here for: MY TWO PREDICTIONS,WORLD DISARMAMENT & A POLICE STATE AND MONEY CRASH & A CASHLESS NATION

~ PLEASE VISIT THE SITE LISTED ON THE BANNER BELOW ~
AS A LOT OF MY INFORMATION I USED HAS BEEN COMPILED BY THEM
THANK YOU FOLKS FROM PATRIOT SAINTS, GOD BLESS
PASTOR BILL