Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Case #43

You are getting sign out from your colleagues about your patients over the week end. One of your patients, Mr. X who is an elderly male being treated for pneumonia apparently went into atrial fibrillation/flutter over the week end. He has never had atrial fibrillation or flutter in the past, he was not hemodynamically compromised, and his heart rate was also well controlled as he was already on a beta blocker for Hypertension. Due to his age (73), history of Hypertension and DM it was decided to anticoagulate him for the risk of stroke. After finishing your sign out, you take a look at the EKG and a rhythm strip that was recorded at the time he went into this new rhythm. What is your interpretation of the 12 lead and rhythm strip and do you agree with the therapeutic plan?

Click here for Better Quality Image of EKG

Click here for Better Quality Image of Rhythm Strip

This patient does have an irregularly irregular rhythm on the 12 lead EKG. However, what is striking in the 12 lead is lead v1. V1 shows a very clear, organized and regular atrial activity at a rate of 270's. The rhythm strip of v1 further demonstrates this regular, organized atrial activity at a rate of 270's. At first instinct, one would want to call this rhythm atrial flutter, but there is some differences between this rhythm and atrial flutter which clearly make this a separate entity called atrial tachycardia.

First the rate is slower that 300. Typically atrial flutter has a atrial rate of 300. FLutter can sometimes be slower or faster, but typically would be 300. What is more important than the rate, is the clear iso-electric point between each p wave which is not typically seen in flutter. Compare Figure 1 to Figure 2.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1 is taken from the rhythm strip in this case and Figure two is from a case of Atrial flutter with variable bloc. Notice in figure 2 that you have the typical saw tooth pattern with no clear iso-electric point between the flutter waves. In figure 1 you can clearly see the tracing returning to baseline after every p wave.

This was the defining characteristic which makes the EKG and Rhythm strip on our patient represent atrial tachycardia and not atrial fibrillation.

The other important finding to pick up on is the variability of the AV nodal block making the rhythm irregularly irregular further making it seem like atrial flutter and fibrillation. In the v1 rhythm strip you can clearly see the different P-R intervals. At the same time the ventricular rate is to fast to assume this is complete heart block. So therefore this is Atrial tachycardia with variable block.

Finally, the reason why it is important to differentiate between atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter is because the treatment of flutter is similar to fibrillation which involves rate control and anticoagulation to prevent embolic events from occurring. In atrial tachycardia, NO ANTICOAGULATION is necessary, hence alleviating the risk of bleeding from heparin and coumadin. So in this case, the heparin should be stopped as anticoagulation is not necessary.