The challenge of
interoperability between services has been a problem for many years.
Each military service is leaning forward on development and the
exploration of new advanced technology to enhance their mission
effectiveness. As each service seeks these new technologies, the
ability for the services to communicate with eachother through these
new advancements has proven very difficult. This was evident during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) in Afghanistan and in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).
The problem is simply
the inability to pass information – the what, when, and where - in a timely and
accurately fashion from one system to another. As information
becomes available our antiquated process of verbal exchanges,
translations, and regurgitation of this information has proven to slow
and inaccurate to operate efficiently with today's technology.
Capabilities in the field have advanced, but the communication between
these technologies has been left behind leaving considerable gaps in our
network centric operations.
In a speech given to
the Command Communication Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance
(C2ISR) conference June 2002, General John Jumper, former Chief of Staff
of the Air Force, challenged the services to develop the capability to
pass information from one resource to another, regardless of service.
This challenge was a direct result of significant communication problems
encountered during OEF and OIF. In both operations, and in some
cases still today, there were many cases when
soldiers on the ground needed fire support from airborne assets but were
unable to communicate with them.
The challenge set forth
was to develop the capability for one machine operating its own unique
software to communicate with another machine operating completely
different software, otherwise known as Machine-to-Machine language
(M2M). In response to Gen Jumpers challenge, the US Air
Force Material Command, Electronic Systems Center
(ESC) and the MITRE Corporation developed the concept of ‘Cursor on Target’
(CoT).
|