<< Previous | Up | Next >> |
"The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain."
G'Kar quoting G'Quon, in "Babylon 5", season 3, episode 66, "Z'ha'dum" (Never heard of G'Kar or B5? Shame on you!)"Midi guo wauride jhaokhai, yelka, ubam pam kimseke, yivisin ubam pam jefikomo. Lach bire sukhi yighuo me, lach jhaokhai vekomo. Bire uzi mider lidaekeo misinoren."
1. Midi guo wauride jhaokhai, time future ESS+around-DEF.COP GEN+1sI 2. yelka, ubam pam kimseke, waiting-NDF ESS-moment moment transition-NDF 3. yivisin ubam pam jefikomo. GEN-birth ESS-moment moment revelation 4. Lach bire sukhi yighuo me, nobody know-PRS shape-DEF GEN-future that 5. lach jhaokhai vekomo. nobody GEN+1sI where-CAU 6. Bire uzi mider lidaekeo misinoren. know-PRS only always COM-pain give_birth-PRS-OBJ
1.a. In truth, guo is enough; midi guo emphasizes the meaning of 'future time' over mere 'tomorrow'.
1.b. Waur is the (irregular) essive case of gaur 'surroundings, the area around something' (a 'locative noun'). The definite mark -i is not necessary except for euphonic purposes; SYV doesn't like diphthong + sonorant syllable endings.
2.a. Obviously pam 'moment' is one of those nouns that show plurality by reduplication.
2.b. The word for 'transition', kimseke, partly mirrors the Latin structure; kim- means 'through, across, diametrically', while seke means 'change'.
3. The causative-inceptive copula komo combines with fi, fit 'seeing' ('cause to be seeing') and then takes the deverbal/nominalizer je-. So the word for 'revelation' means 'the action of making one see'.
4, 5. Inclusive-or coordination is tricky in SYV. In this case, as usual, the alternative is made clear through juxtaposition and parallelism.
5. Strange! Vekomo may as well be verokomo; the causative-inceptive not only applies to states, but to physical locations (same as de and, of course, 'to be'); therefore ve-komo is a perfectly regular form, 'where (will) X cause Y to be' = 'where will X take Y', where the patient (Y) is in the genitive case, jhaokhai, i. e. 'us'.
6.a. Uzi is, strictly speaking, u-zi 'in exclusivity', 'in exclusive-state'.
6.b. You will note that the subclause ('it is always born in pain') appears to be impersonal in SYV. This is intentional, since we don't mean misinor 'give birth' here, but 'be born'. This is achieved by leaving out the subject (the occupation of the front, subject slot by the oblique complement lidaekeo also helps) and resuming the object explicitly, using -n on the verb. SYV does this to mimic a passive phrase with no stated agent.