Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

<< home  < Articles

Alternative Biofuels

Threads - Alternate Biofeuls,
see also Not Enough Alcohol

On 3/11/2006, Garry Dalrymple posted:

Last week while I was going through a month or so's accumulated newspapers I saw a brief mention that I regret now that I didn't keep. It was in a motoring section and it was a brief statement by a researcher to the effect that you can run a car on plant matter, that is heat up wood and drive the car on the resulting volatile fumes.

I was brought up on stories of how 'during the war .....' cars were run off charcoal burners and canvas gas bags. A small amount of petrol (or Brandy?) was used to start the car, then switched to gas for driving.

Like I say, I regret not keeping the article, but I believe it quoted something like 5 Kg of burnt wood could replace 2 or 3 litres of petrol, at any rate much less 'stuff' to grow to produce ethanol or biodiesel. I believe there was even speculation about burning paper and other waste products.

I have no idea how dirty the resulting emissions would be, but using 1940s technology could allow motoring of a sort to survive in a 'Post Oil' Mad Max/Bartertown sort of a world?

Wood-gas powered car

Adler limousine converted to run on wood as a source fuel

          Anthony Morton replied:

Well, yes and no.  I'm unsure of the exact chemical composition of the fumes from smouldering wood but would guess it's mainly carbon monoxide with some light organic compounds like methane, methanol or formaldeyhde.  All lovely toxic stuff but perfectly viable as fuel.  (Very similar to the old 'town gas' used here prior to the natural gas discoveries of the 1960s.)

But what we need to understand about the fuels question is it's all a problem of scale.  The problem with oil supplies is not that we're actually running out of oil, but that we're using it up as fast as we can pump it out of the ground, and the future of oil production is downward, not upward.

The most dense biofuel source we've got is methanol obtained by digesting wood.  It's entirely doable but even so, it can't be scaled up to match our current level of petrol consumption because the resources are too limited.  (There probably isn't enough water to grow all that timber for a start.)

Biofuels will certainly provide transport fuel on a smaller scale, but then so will oil if we scale down our consumption.  It's all a matter of how much we need.  If there's 20 years of oil left at current consumption levels, that's the same as 200 years at levels that are 10 per cent of current consumption.  That's about as much as we can realistically hope to sustain with biofuels.

Geoff  Pain responded:

I've been looking at biofuels recently and it is possible to produce eucalyptus oil for less than $1 per litre. It was used as fuel in spark ignition engines in road demonstrations in Perth in the early 1980s and seriously investigated in the US.

It stabilizes ethanol/petrol and ethanol/diesel mixtures against phase separation due to water.

Biomass can give about 300 kg of liquid fuel per tonne and the technology for ethanol from cellulose is well developed.

So it seems to me ethanol with eucalyptus oil as denaturant and multiphase stabilizer would be the go.

Using eucalyptus for electric power generation has successfully been demonstrated by Verve with a $12.5 million experimental plant at Narrogin and produced charcoal and activated carbon as well as oil (20% of plant income) as by-products from coppiced mallee.

A town of 5000 people can be self-fuelled (including biomass harvest) by such a plant and its waste heat can also desalinate the town's water supply.

Australia's tree plantations have quadrupled in the last decade but still only cover a tiny 700,000 hectares.

Meredith (Soundwarp) commented:


My grandfather built his own burner, called a 'Gas Producer', when petrol was scarce circa 1940. It was made from second hand materials (no new materials available then), and put onto a trailer behind the car, a 30's something Oldsmobile Coupe. Coke was fed into the fire. With all the pumping of bellows and looking so weird, my mother used to cower in the back seat, hoping no one would see her!

Nisaba cackled:

I have a few of those old-technology "gas producers" in my household. There're two attached to the south end of dogs, and one attached to the south end of a teenager.

I really should put up a warning sign reading "No open flames - house subject to spontaneous explosions without warning".

Do you think it would keep the burglars away?

Garry Dalrymple wrote:

I suppose I shouldn't be telling you this, but apparently (in Melbourne) there's a popular indoor sport called 'Farting Cricket'.

If its heard, its one run, if its commented, two runs, if it fills the room, four runs and if people leave the room it's a six!

Gerald Cairns retorted:

I shall describe an LBW that occurred in our Hotel in Holland.

We chose to eat at the truckies rest stop restaurant opposite the Hotel (way too expensive in their up market dining room) where the food was good and very reasonably priced - actually a bit lower than Australian prices which was surprising. One colleague discovered "Russian Eggs" and liked them so much he almost became addicted. This dish consisted of 3 large sections of three different fish with three or four eggs on top plus a very spicy sauce and garlic bread - a huge dish. The morning after I was following him out of the Hotel and he was walking very fast toward and out of the revolving door. I don't walk so fast these days but I discovered I was following a really foul odour trail that later explained why he was walking so fast. Close to the door was a group of black suited businessmen in serious conversation who as it happened turn around to see where the foul odour was coming from and guess who was in just the right place to get the blame? :-)) I felt like pointing to my colleague outside with both hands but decided a fast exit was the best move. When I got into the double compartmented revolving door the odour was truly foul and was very glad there was no one else present.

Having reached outside said colleague said he could not help it and had to make a rapid exit out into the very cold atmosphere, for which I thanked him, now that on his account I was now a marked man. :-) Unless he could control himself he would be banned from Russian Eggs in future! Be warned - a great meal but has consequences. Maybe we could strap him to the carburetor and feed him Russian Eggs ought to be worth excellent fuel consumption with nutrition thrown in as a bonus. His office is in Perth and mine in Fernvale Qld which is just as well.


I shudder to think what would constitute a LBW.

Peter Adderley added:

I went looking for Billy Connolly's summation of "things we should avoid as we get older."

A google search didn't produce much, but from a related quote from a live performance a friend told me about last week:

"When you're our age:
1. don't EVER fall over.
2. if you pass by a public toilet, use it.
3. never trust a fart.
4. if you have an erection, use it."

Garry you're disgusting, but isn't it that why it makes it funny?
We should cherish these ideas before they evaporate completely.
Perhaps this is the other face, or bottom, of fundamentalism.

Steve van Zed wrote:

As I was only 12 or 13 at that time I do not know any technical details.
But gas bags and wood gassing were used. Some cars - mostly taxis? - had rectangular wooden boxes fitted on their roof about 20" (30"?) high. Inside was a bag (canvas?) and that was filled with normal 'house' gas. Very interesting to look at that inflating bag while being filled.

This did not last long: At some stage all gas supplies were cut off.
(To all houses too. Later same with electricity!)
Wood gassing: Used mainly for busses. Burning of wood with minimal oxygen. The busses pulled one-axle trailers with some kind of kettle/burner.
Every now and then the driver would get out and adjust something. Filling the burner was done at the depot, mainly wood.
Occasionally I saw them used later on on trucks and even one used in the good land of Oz not that long ago.
Must be the same process used to make charcoal, difference being the desired end products

One winter when there was snow and ice over all the roads I once, sitting on my sledge, held on to one of those trailers and let myself be pulled through the whole city, hooking off when I was home again!
I tried it later again, but the drivers were warned.

and:

Re-reading Garry's e-mail it suddenly hit me that the whole proces of wood gassing was so primitive and simple it must have been economical!
Wood, or anything that will burn well enough is gassed and the volatile fumes drive a motor, or heats dirctly. Voila, you have your energy. Not only that you have charcoal as residue.
Every conversion costs energy, every transport costs energy, so take the shortest route.
Might thinking about the Stirling Motor be a good thing too?

David replied:

A couple of years ago ( sorry I can't be more precise, the years tend to merge after a while) there was a feature article in one of the Saturday papers about a person driving such a vehicle around the Northern Territory. He had what looked like a large port-a- gas bottle mounted on his back bumper(if I recollect correctly) which was his gas making plant. According to the article, and obviously one must take into account journalistic licence, the owner simply chopped up wood from the side of the road and used it as his fuel. Also it stated that a few kilos of wood was enough for a hundred kilometres.(I take this with a considerable skerrick of sodium chloride). The article may be available on the archive- we mainly get the "Sydney Morning Herald".

Pedant mode. Shouldn't it be alternative biofuels? Or were you planning on using a different fuel every second day?