Fugu - Painkiller?
Threads - Fugu as a
Painkiller
On
1/12/2003, Tamara Kelly posted:
Hahahaha - let's go out and lick some toadfish
Poison from Lethal Fish Could Be
a Painkiller
Sat Nov 29, 9:12 PM ET Add
Science - Reuters to My Yahoo!
By Rachelle Younglai
TORONTO (Reuters) - A tiny
Canadian company wants to use poison from a fish -- a substance more
toxic than cyanide -- to help cancer patients suppress pain or to wean
heroin addicts off their habit.
International Wex Technologies,
a Vancouver-based company listed on the small-cap Canadian Venture
Exchange, says early trials show positive results from tetrodotoxin,
although bigger and more extensive tests will be needed before the
product reaches the marketing stage.
It says the new drug could be on
the market within three years, if all the tests work out.
The new drug is derived from a
blowfish poison -- a substance so dangerous that a mere trace can
paralyze a person within minutes.
The blowfish is known to
gourmets as the source of the sometimes deadly Japanese fugu delicacy,
a dish that can be prepared only by trained and licensed chefs, because
the slip of a knife can poison the food, causing the diner to drop to
the ground convulsing and gasping for air.
It has been described as the
culinary version of Russian roulette.
But the drug derived from the
poison, tetrodotoxin, has already passed two phases of clinical tests,
and doctors conducting early surveys say it eased pain in terminally
ill cancer patients, where no other pain medication had worked.
"It quickly became apparent that
some patients were having a dramatic response. You would not have
expected these results in existing treatments," said Dr Edward Sellers,
a professor of pharmacology at the University of Toronto who helped Wex
conduct its Phase II trials, a study of 22 patients.
Sellers said one patient in his
mid-50s was in such agony that he couldn't even wear his clothes
without sharp surges of pain.
But with shots of Tectin, Wex's
patented name for tetrodotoxin, his pain subsided for more than week.
Researchers injected patients
with several micrograms of Tectin – a quantity so small it can't be
seen with the naked eye -- twice a day for four days, and found that
nearly 70 percent experienced a reduction in pain.
Pain relief began around the
third day of treatment, and often lasted after the final injection. In
some cases, the relief extended beyond 15 days, the study showed.
Tectin, a sodium channel
blocker, stops nerves from sending pain signals to the brain.
The company says Tectin differs
from other painkillers in that it doesn't have the same side effects as
morphine and its derivatives, doesn't interact with other medicines and
is not addictive. It is up to 3,200 times stronger than morphine.
The success of the early Tectin
tests is a small coup for a company that has set its sights on the $38
billion North American painkiller market,some 10 percent of which comes
from managing cancer pain.
Wex says that each puffer fish
can provide about 600 doses of the drug from within its liver, kidneys
and reproductive organs, so there is no shortage of the toxin.
POISON AS PAINKILLER
It wasn't always about pain for
Wex.
Wex's founder, Hay Kong Shum, a
medical technician who was educated in Russia and China, originally
hoped Tectin would help ease withdrawal symptoms. But preliminary
studies found the poison had painkilling properties and the company,
facing limited resources, decided to take a shortcut to profitability.
It put the heroin therapy on the back burner and turned to the
painkiller industry.
"It was the easiest way for us
to get to market," said Donna Shum, Hay , Kong's daughter and Wex's
chief operating officer.
Wex's interim test results have
caused some murmurings among health-care workers who wonder about the
potential of this painkiller.
But researchers and analysts are
not yet touting Tectin as a drug to rival morphine. Wex still has to
take its drug through crucial phase III trials, where it ramps up its
test numbers to at least 400 patients.
The drug also faces an image
problem.
"Because it's associated with
death, it got a bad rap," said Sellers.
And although the scientific
community may acknowledge the properties and benefits of the compound,
it is less accepting of a drug derived from nature. "There is a
resistance from the medical community to accept treatments from the
natural world," said Rob Peets, an analyst with Golden Capital
Securities. "If this was a chemical product it would have been snapped
up a long time ago."
Wex's stock has jumped about 150
percent since August.
Charles
deG replied:
The
problem here is you would die,before any pain was killed.
Paul Williams
responded:
I thought it was
only canetoads that were licked by you Queenslanders?
Seriously, it
sounds very promising.
Anything which
can alleviate pain in the terminally ill is to be welcomed.
I wonder what
tests of the blue-ringed octopus venom could reveal? This venom
paralyses its victims. I wonder what extremely tiny doses could do?
I cannot think of other venoms which would not be painful offhand
(and must admit I do not know if there is local pain involved with blue
ringed octopus bites).
Any thoughts?
Peter Macinnis posted:
At 17:40 1/12/03
+1000, Paul wrote:
>I
wonder what tests of the blue-ringed octopus venom could reveal?
>This venom paralyses its victims. I wonder what extremely tiny doses
>could do?
Tetrodotoxin
(TTX) is a highly efficient killer, and strangely distributed among
living things. A number of fish store TTX and related analogues in
their tissues, but it turns up also in the blue-ringed octopus,
seastars, crabs, marine snails and molluscs, flatworms, ribbonworms and
even marine algae. On land, some frogs, newts and salamanders, carry
the same venom as
well.
It goes against
all probability that such a diverse group of animals (and even algae)
could have evolved the same poison. What is far more likely is that
some smaller organism, down at the bottom of the food chain, makes the
toxin which others collect. As proof of this, puffer fish grown in
culture do not contain TTX until they are given tissue from a
TTX-producing fish to eat, presumably passing on some of the microbes
which actually make the TTX.
So yes, a
healing dish of stir-fried blue-ringed occy could be on the menu one
day. But look into the links betweem TTX and zombies . . .
>I
cannot think of other venoms which would not be painful offhand (and
>must admit I do not know if there is local pain involved with blue
>ringed octopus bites).
Off-hand,
the only painless poison I can think of is the hemlock that Socrates
took. Not water hemlock, the other one.
Ray commented:
>>Any
thoughts?
according to the
latest Toyota adds, snake venom possibly has a recreational
market. :)
SManson
suggested:
Perhaps
you should look at homeopathy?
Tamara Kelly
added:
Paintball will
never be the same. Phoot! GOTCHA!!!
An abundant
google:
http://www.pharmanet.com.br/pdf/np970460e.pdf
http://groups.msn.com/TheAlchemistsCorner/thezombiepoison.msnw
http://puffernet.tripod.com/tetrodotoxin.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~electrikmonk/Neuro/artZombie.htm
http://www.aret.asso.fr/artoxinmts6.htm
That was a fun
little distraction from work
Peter Macinnis replied:
At 18:18 1/12/03 +1030, somebody
unpronounceable except maybe in Serbian wrote:
>Perhaps
you should look at homeopathy?
Great idea -- feed toadfish to the
homeopaths!
Thanks for that inspiring thought
. . . or did you mean feed the homeopaths to the toadfish? That
seems a little harsh . . .
Tamara Kelly
wrote:
Ahh well... a
couple of years ago a very large toadfish fed himself a fisherman's big
toe. So perhaps they like the taste of long pork?
When we're down
in the mangroves I know I shouldn't but I just love to pick them up and
hear them croak! They're to soft and squishy! The toadfish that is -
not the homeopaths.
When is your
toxins book due to be published?
Peter
Macinnis replied:
So
in answer to your question, the edited ms is due back any day now, and
it should go through several cycles before heading to the printer in
March. I plan to turn 60 in Paris or on Cyprus in April, so
release will be May, most probably.
Printing
is the quick bit -- design, getting the words right (I noticed a
reference to "gastric lavage" in the text last night -- that
has
to go if my editor hasn't killed it), getting the pics, stuff like that
is what takes the time.
Now
while we are talking about me, let's not: let's turn to something
serious. Bloody serious.
For those who don't know me, I am a scrivener and
word herder by trade, but because I write about science, I have largely
ignored the stuff that is going on in the Arts Industry about free
trade and the effects it will have. It didn't apply to the likes
of me, I thought. Wrong: even science writers are affected.
If
people have been following the free trade bullshit (this is the
finely-orchestrated Armageddon where the Tory Party ensures a level
playing field by making it vertical and instead of moving the
goalposts, sells them off for woodchips), I have been told of an interesting
gotcha with my history of rockets. Several US publishers "quite liked
it", but because my story starts with me on my way to Woomera for the
launch of a Scramjet last year, they feel it will not sell enough
copies to Mercans. It is overtly foreign, and so will not appeal
to the US market. And this in a book which has a chapter on the
use of rockets in the war of 1814, and involved me in research in
Washington DC, Massachusetts, Maryland and California!
Perhaps
you remember the old line "Yes, but what have you done for me lately?"
The
US distributors who took my last book are willing to carry this one, so
it will get out in the USA, but bleedin eck, if a bit of introductory
atmospherics set in a place where the natives are friendly but just a
bit exotic is enough to put the Seppos off from allowing
a book largely about the USA to have a separate imprint, can you
imagine what would happen if the Yarts generally have to compete in an
environment set according to the cultural standards of fat men with no
necks and perfect teeth at both ends in Hollywood? "Don't mention
the war" has nothing on this sort of cultural insularity and
self-centredness.
We
MUST resist any attempt to sell off our cultural heritage for the
alleged benefit of the wheat cockies, or we won't be allowed to call
them that any more. Our Rugby-tragic PM would not sell off
"footie", but he will do the dirty on all the latte-swilling writers
and film-makers and creative people, possibly because they are not
lining up like the sweaty boofheads of field, track, oval and pool to
be photographed with You Know Who.
If
I believed closer contact would add to the ferment, well and good:
Hollywood today would be a far poorer place without the Oz contingent.
If cultural closeness benefited both sides, it would be excellent, but
I see now that we will merely be blended, blinded and blanded. I
want to be the spice in a stir-fry, not the trace of tofu in a mess of
pottage that some mindless vote-hunter can then trade off, along with
my birthright.
Tamara Kelly
replied:
Tell them to
"get buggered". [suitably offensive phrase in America]
What is so
foreign about a drive in the desert to Americans? They have huge
tracts of empty land like we do. I read a book last year on
someone driving through Arizona and really enjoyed the
differences and similarities. *They* didn't have to change it for
the Australian market.
Note also
"Rockets" is packed with detail and some fairly complex language to it
requires careful reading. Anyone able to handle reading it should be
able to manage a bit of "foriner" feeling to it.
We complain
about the dumbing down of Australia but obviously the smooth faced
people with ceramic smailes of Hollywood are better at it. Pity for the
Mercans.
Gary-Peter
Dalrymple added :
>according
to the latest Toyota adds, snake venom possibly has a recreational
market. :)
This
is wishful thinking
Snake
bites to humans are seldom fatal in themselves, as the poor little
serpent isn't designed to eat people and when disturbed by humans they
are seldom in a fit state to deliver a 'full load' of venom in any
case. The shock and terror of presumed death from a snake
bite is enough to send you into a highly stressful state that can
magnify the effect, though.
I
have read (in fictional sources including Sherlock Holmes, 'The Scarlet
Band'? ) that Cobra Venom is said to be halucinogenic
It's
not the Temple that saves you, some White Trash Evangelical Baptist
cults in the US feature snake handling and 'protected by faith' (bible
text reference escapes me for the moment) they are 'immune' to harm as
they dance with handfuls of rattlesnakes etc. (not quite true as
fatalities do occur and the frequently bitten often suffer multiple
arthritis like deformities).
Ruby
Wax did a special on these people some years back.
Bitten
time and again, survivors of these congregations come back for more;
who can say if it is the rattler venom of the ecstatic dancing or
sermonising that brings them back.
However
to be fair to your temple folk, the production of a snake's venom is a
significant biological investment for the animal, with experiance the
snake could decide that carrying a full potency venom load was
unneccessary if feeding at the temple was routine.
Ian Musgrave
added:
Late reply as
I've been off at the 37th Australian Society for Clinical and
Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology's Annual Scientific Meeting.
At 05:40
1/12/03 +1000, Paul wrote:
>-----
Original Message -----
>From: "Tamara Kelly"
>Subject: fugu as a painkiller
> > Hahahaha - let's go out and
lick some toadfish!
It's not funny.
Tetordotoxin could very well be an effective pain killer, certainly
coneshell venoms are. At the above meeting we had a symposium talk that
featured coneshell venoms as pain killers. I'm trying to convince a
potential postdoc to screen snake venoms for analgesic properties.
Tetrodotoxin is
insanely toxic, but as Paracelcus said "What makes a poison is the
dose". Tetrodotoxin works by blocking the sodium channels in nerves,
which stops them generating the electrical activity that they need to
transmit nerve signals. Now if you give enough tetrodotoxin,
nerve activity stops in all nerves in the whole organism, this is Not A
Good Thing (tm).
However, if you
only give a little bit of tetrodotoxin (and given that tetrodotoxin is
insanely toxic, we are talking in the order of nanograms per adult),
you will only slow the activity of nerves, rather than stop them. At
the right dose, you can slow down the activity of the pain nerves,
rather than the nerves that control helpful things like breathing.
Also, the sodium channels in the nerves come in several versions, some
with greater sensitivity to tetrodotoxin than others, and so
tetrodotoxin can have more of an effect on the pain nerves.
Fish hunting
snails (yes, that's right) of the genus Conus also produce venoms that
have the potential to kill humans, Conus geographicas envenomations
kill one or two people a year. Conus shells produce a slew of paralytic
components in their venom, and one omega contoxin MVIIA, specifically
targets the calcium channels on nerves. At the correct doses, it
selectively targets pain nerves. It is now marketed as Ziconititide and
used in chronic pain.
See http://grimwade.biochem.unimelb.edu.au/cone/main.htm
>I
thought it was only canetoads that were licked by you Queenslanders?
We can lick
anything
>Seriously,
it sounds very promising.
>Anything which can alleviate pain in the terminally ill is to be
>welcomed.
>
>I wonder what tests of the blue-ringed octopus venom could reveal?
>This venom paralyses it's victims. I wonder what extremely tiny
doses
>could do?
Like the
conotoxins, blue ringed octopus venom is a multicomponent venom, and
the various components are being investigated for pharmacological
activity.
>I
cannot think of other venoms which would not be painful offhand (and
>must admit I do not know if there is local pain involved with blue
>ringed octopus bites).
There is a
serious local industry investigating venoms as a source of new drugs of
various sorts. One of the most successful drug classes used to treat
high blood pressure (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors) was
developed from a snake venom.
Paul Williams
responded:
There is no
doubt that people who attempt this will become future "Darwin Award"
nominees :
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/
Kristie
West added:
Am I the only Simpsons nerd who's
watching this thread while recollecting the episode where Homer orders
Fugu at a sushi restaurant? The master chef is in the back of the car
with his girlfriend, so the apprentice takes the full fish and stands
there with the guide saying "Poison fish, poison fish, Tasty Fish!",
the tasty fish being a sliver about 2 mm wide.
Paul Williams posted:
<snip
very interesting research>
> There is a serious local industry investigating venoms as a source
of new
> drugs of various sorts. One of the most successful drug classes
used to
> treat high blood pressure (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme
inhibitors) was
> developed from a snake venom.
>
On potential new
drug classes:
I remember
reading some time ago of research into antiobiotics in marine
environments. It appeared that new classes of antibiotics could
eventually be produced from this research.
There was also a
snippet I read somewhere on the the incredible variety of antibiotic
activity in soils rich in organic matter.
It appears that
we desperately need to develop new antibiotics as many pathogens are
becoming resistant to the antibiotics we have. My understanding - such
as it is - indicates that it can take 10 years to develop a new drug
and that the expense can be exorbitant.
I guess that the
questions are:
Are there many
promising new classes of antibiotics in the 'pipeline'?
If there are,
could they be 'fast-tracked' into production when - as seems possible
in the near future - millions become infected with bacterial pathogens
which are resistant to all classes of antibiotics?
If there are no
promising new classes of antibiotics in the 'pipeline', is it true that
we may be in deep trouble?
Ray added:
>>There
was also a snippet I read somewhere on the incredible variety of
antibiotic activity in soils rich in organic matter.
That Paul, is the source of most
of (if not all) the ....mycin antibiotics and penicillin. A
fungus needs defence against all manner of bacteria in the soil, and
they've been practicing the art for a billion years.
Peter Macinnis
wrote:
>I
guess that the questions are:
>Are there many promising new classes of antibiotics in the
'pipeline'?
>If there are, could they be 'fast-tracked' into production when - as
>seems possible in the near future - millions become infected with
>bacterial pathogens which are resistant to all classes of
antibiotics?
One piece I read
last night argued that there have been no new antibiotic classes for
three decades mainly because nobody was looking too hard.
It is probably
better to shout "wolf!" at the moment and put the frighteners on those
who misuse antibiotics, but my suspicion is that right now, there are a
number of interesting lines to pursue. One paper from "Science" that I
read this morning notes that antibiotic substances were reported in the
literature as far back as 1877.
>If
there are no promising new classes of antibiotics in the 'pipeline',
>is it true that we may be in deep trouble?
Perhaps -- it
depends how much we waste what we have available. Until quite recently,
antibiotics could be sold in Korea without a prescription, but that has
now ended. In some third world countries, you can buy single
tablets of antibiotic, which does no good and immense harm. In
2000, there were 8.mumble new TB cases in the world, 273,000 of them
were resistant to AT LEAST rifampicin and isoniazid, but 70% of these
cases came from just ten countries. Estonia, Latvia, two oblasts
in Russia (Tomsk and another one) and Henan Province in China were the
main centres.
It will take a
concerted public health attack to bring these centres under control.
One interesting
line of thought: setting up benign bacteria like E. coli to produce the
markers of pathogens to stimulate immune responses . . . there is more
than one way of skinning the cat.
Ray
asked
What
is the name of that antibiotic (begins with "F"..?) extracted from a
red species of seaweed within the last couple of years in Australia?
There
are also, I remember hearing, a range of enzymes produced by fly
maggots which have antibacterial effect.
Anything
which by nature of habitat, requires defence against microscopic
predators (IMO) probably has potential as a source for antibiotic and
bactericidal compounds.