Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Aliens111 Navigation
Home
Back
Forward
Sign Guestbook
View Guestbook
Contact US
Direct Connect
Suggest this Site
Search Aliens111
Join Mailing List
Refresh Page
Aliens111 Products
UFO Detectors
Video and Audio
UFO Video Page
UFO Audio Page
Tennessee Video
UFO News Feed
Filer Files
Submission Section
Submit Encounter
Submit URL
Submit Banner
Win our Award!
Award Submit
Aliens111 Webring
Join our Webring
Main Pages
Rendlesham Forest
Washington 1952
Tunguska 1908
UFO Pictures
UFO Quotes
Banner Page
Disclosure Project
Sightings Reports
Crop Circles
Bob Lazar Interview
UFO Theories
Mississippi Abductions
Abductee Quiz
Roswell Crash
Face on Mars
Krill Report
Dr. J Allen Hynek
Spot a Hoax
UFO History
The Greys
Recovered Bodies
UFO Link Page
About the Webmaster
Our Other Sites
UFO Gazette.com
UFO Detectors.com


   Search Aliens111


Join our Mailing List

Receive our monthly news letter and update notifications.
Name:
Email:


JoinUnsubscribe

   Search the Web








ROSWELL - UFO CRASH - 1947 - PAGE 4
You will need RealOne Player® to download thise files.       It can be downloaded here.
If you have problems with any of the files playing, please let me know.

Although not mentioned in the spurious MJ-12 briefing-paper, there was reportedly another crash site in an area west of Socono, New Mexico, in the Plains of San Agustin, where witnesses allegedly discovered not only a damaged metallic disc resting on the flat desert ground, but also dead bodies - and possibly a survivor. The location of this site remains in dispute. If the unauthenticated memorandum from Hillenkoetter of 19 September 1947, for example, is anything to go by, the second recovery of an `unidentified planform aircraft' (in addition to thewreckage site 75 miles north-west of Roswell) occurred 10 miles north-west of Oscura Peak, 35 miles south-east of Socono. This would place it within the White Sands Proving Ground, but nowhere near the Plains of San Agustin. According to Hillenkoetter's report, the first recovery took place 30 miles east of Alamogordo Army Air Field, over 100 miles south-east of Socorro - again, nowhere near the Plains.

An early witness on the scene was Grady L. `Barney' Barnett, a civil engineer with the US Soil Conservation Service who was on a military assignment at the time, working from Magdalena. He told his friends LaVerne and Jean Maltais that in the late 1940s (the July 1947 date later established by Stanton Friedman) he had encountered a metallic, disc-shaped `aircraft' in the desert. While he was examining it, a small group of people arrived who said they were part of an archaeological research team from the University of Pennsylvania.

According to the Maltaises, Barnett recalled that the bodies apparently had fallen out of the craft, which had split open on impact. The disc seemed to be made of a metal that looked like dirty stainless steel. When Barnett approached for a closer look, he noticed dead bodies inside and outside the vehicle - the ones outside thrown out by the impact. They were like humans but they were not humans, he reported. The heads were round and larger in proportion to their bodies, hairless, and the eyes small and oddly spaced. Their clothing seemed to be one-piece and grey in colour, without zippers, belts or buttons. Military personnel approached and cordoned off the area. `We were told to leave the area and not to talk to anyone whatever about what we had seen . . . that it was our patriotic duty to remain silent,' Barnett told the Maltaises. In his affidavit, included in a briefing for the Congressional Staff prepared by Fred Whiting and the Fund for UFO Research, LaVerne Maltais stated as follows:

. . . Around 1950, Mr. Barnett told me that several years before, during a field trip in New Mexico, he discovered a crashed disc-shaped craft with the bodies of strange beings on the ground. He was absolutely convinced that the craft was from outer space.

The beings he described were similar - but not identical - to humans. They were 3 1/2 to 4 feet tall; slim and hairless, with large pear-shaped heads. They had four fingers on each hand. T'hey were dressed in tight-fitting, metallic suits. All of them were dead.

Mr. Barnett said that at the time of his discovery, he was joined by four or five people on an archeology dig. Shortly afterward, military personnel arrived and escorted them from the area. They told him to keep quiet about the incident, that it was in the national interest for them to get out of there. Mr. Barnett was a man of great personal integrity who would never tell a lie.

At least three other local people told Stanton Friedman about their recollections of a flying saucer having crashed `out in the Plains' at the time: one confirmed that it had been brought out at night by the military, through Magdalena.z And in the 1960s William D. Leed III, then a Colonel with the US Army Reserve Signal Corps, who had a strong interest in UFOs, went to visit Barnett, at the suggestion of a fellow officer. In his affidavit, included in the Fund for UFO Research's Congressional briefing, Leed stated:

. . . In early September of 1964 or 1965, I visited Mr. Barnett at his home in Roswell, N.M., and identified myself as a member of the military whose interest was purely personal and not official. I talked with him for about 15 minutes. He told me of coming upon a `flying saucer' in the desert more than 10 years before and inspecting it. He said he touched it and found it not to be hot. It had a very smooth surface. He said it was about 12 feet across and saucer-shaped. He walked around it but was unable to enter it. He said that, two-to-three days later, the area was swarming with people from the U.S. Army Air Forces who removed the `saucer'.

Mr. Barnett told me he was subsequently interviewed for many hours on at least three occasions by men from several different levels of government, was told to `shut up', and was threatened, and felt threatened by them . . .

Another, more controversial witness to the alleged Plains of San Agustin incident is Gerald Anderson, who claims to have been present at the crash site (near Horse Springs) when he was six years old, together with his father, brother, uncle and cousin. He confirms that five college students and their professor (Dr Buskirk) subsequently arrived on the scene, and insists that one of the three alien creatures survived the crash. Anderson has provided a great deal of intriguing information, published in Stanton Friedman's and Don Berliner's book Crash at Corona. Although Schmitt and Randle reject the Anderson story outright, Friedman and Berliner present some evidence for its authenticity.

The Plains of San Agustin are about 150 miles west of the Corona site. Was the disc allegedly recovered near Horse Springs another craft that had also come to grief independently, or had it collided with the disc supposedly recovered closer to Roswell? Randle and Schmitt have satisfied themselves that the archaeological research team was present at a site 35 miles north-north-west of Roswell (their preferred location for the recovery of bodies) - not the Plains of San Agustino - but Friedman and Berliner dispute this. And it has to be said that the testimony of Frank Kaufmann, who provided the location of this site, is extremely dubious, as Karl Pflock shows convincingly.

Among those assigned to guarding one of the crash sites and, later, removing the bodies to the Roswell base was Sergeant Melvin Brown, who years later told his family about the incident. `They had to form a ring around whatever it was they had to cover, and everything was put on trucks, said Beverly Bean one of Brown's daughters, when I interviewed the family:

They were told not to look and to take no notice, and were sworn to secrecy. I can remember my dad saying he couldn't understand why they wanted refrigerated trucks. And him and another guy had to sit on the back of the truck to take this stuff to a hangar. They were packed in ice. And he lifted up the tarpaulin and looked in, and he saw three (or possibly two) dead bodies.

He told us they were nothing to be scared of. They were friendly-looking and had nice faces. They looked Asian, he said, but had larger heads and no hair. They looked a yellowy colour. He was frightened a bit, because he knew he shouldn't be doing it, so he only had a quick glimpse.

According to other witnesses, the initial autopsies were carried out at Roswell Army Air Field. Glenn Dennis, a mortician with the Ballard Funeral Home, who did contract work at the base (induding ambulance work), is one of many who have signed affidavits for a Congressional inquiry, testifying to the recovery of alien wreckage and bodies. For me, his testimony is reliable and convincing.

One afternoon in July 1947 Dennis was asked by the base mortuary officer about the availability of small, hermetically sealed coffins, in case they might be needed `in future'. Less than an hour later the officer called again, asking Dennis to describe the chemical preparation for bodies that had been lying in the desert for 'a period of time and what effect such procedures would have on the bodies' chemical compounds, blood and tissues.

Dennis explained that the chemicals he used were mainly strong solutions of formaldehyde and water, and that the procedure would probably alter the bodily chemical composition. `I offered to come out to the base to assist with any problem he might have,' Dennis stated, `but he reiterated that the information was for future use.'

Just over an hour later Dennis received a request to transport a serviceman who had been injured in an unrelated incident. He drove an ambulance to the back of the base infirmary and parked alongside another ambulance. `The door was open and inside I saw some wreckage,' he reports in his affidavit. `There were several pieces . . . about three feet in length [which] resembled stainless steel with a purple hue, as if it had been exposed to high temperature. There was some strange-looking writing on the material resembling Egyptian hieroglyphics. Also two MPs [military policemen] were present.'

After checking in the serviceman, Dennis proceeded to the staff lounge, intending to look for a nurse - a second lieutenant - with whom he was romantically involved.

I saw her coming out of one of the examining rooms with a cloth over her mouth. She said, `My gosh, get out of here or you're going to be in a lot of trouble.' She went into another door where a captain stood. He asked me who I was and what I was doing here. I told him, and he instructed me to stay there. I said, `It looks like you've got a crash; would you like me to get ready?' He told me to stay right there. The two MPs came and began to escort me out of the infirmary. They said they had orders to follow me out to the funeral home.

Another captain then advised Dennis that he had seen nothing, that there had been no crash, and that if he said anything he could get into a lot of trouble. `Hey look, mister,' said Dennis, `I'm a civilian and you can't do a damn thing to me.' `Yes we can,' replied the captain, `somebody will be picking your bones out of the sand.'

The following day, Dennis tried to contact the nurse, who later called back and agreed to meet him. 'Before I talk to you' she insisted, 'you have to give me your sacred oath that you will never mention my name.' Dennis gave his word, and she told him an extraordinary story.

The nurse said she had been asked by two doctors to take notes while they performed a preliminary autopsy on three small bodies, 3 1/2 to 4 feet in height. There was a terrible smell, and it was the most gruesome sight she had ever seen. Two of the bodies were mangled and dismembered, but one was fairly intact. Their heads were disproportionately large for their bodies, and the skulls were flexible. Their eyes were deeply set, their noses concave with two small orifices, and the mouths consisted of a fine slit, with what the doctors described as heavy cartilage instead of teeth. The ears were merely small orifices with flaps. They had no hair, and the skin was very darkened - perhaps from exposure to the sun. The arms were long and slender, with four fingers on the hand which appeared to have small suction cups at each tip. The nurse said that she and the doctors became ill, and the air conditioning had to be turned off in case the smell permeated the hospital. Eventually the autopsy had to be moved to an aircraft hangar.

Glenn Dennis reports that the nurse (recently named as Naomi Maria Selff) was transferred to England, and later he learned that apparently she had been killed in a plane crash during a training mission. No evidence for such a crash has been forthcoming.

Oliver Wendell Henderson, stationed at Roswell Arxny Air Field during the time of the New Mexico crash/retrievals, is yet another witness who has provided testimony. `Pappy' Henderson, who held a Top Secret clearance, ran the `Green Hornet Airline , which involved flying C-54 and C-47 military transport aircraft, carrying VIPs, scientists and materials from Roswell to the Pacific, during the atom-bomb tests. After seeing an article about the Roswell incident in a newspaper in 1980 or 1981, Henderson told his wife to read the article. `It's a true story,' he said. `I'm the pilot who flew the wreckage of the UFO to Dayton, Ohio. I guess now that they're putting it in the papers, I can tell you about this.'

According to an affidavit by Sappho Henderson, her husband described the beings as small, with large heads for their size. `He said the material that their suits were made of was different from anything he had ever seen. He said they looked strange. I believe he mentioned that the bodies had been packed in dry ice to preserve them.'

Congressional Inquiry:

In March 1993, armed with numerous affidavits, US Congressman Steven Schiff (First Congressional District, New Mexico) decided to initiate official inquiries into the Roswell incident. Schiff, who has a background in law and serves as a lieutenant colonel in the New Mexico Air National Guard, began with a letter to Defense Secretary Les Aspin, requesting a written report and a full briefing by Pentagon officials on the nature of the debris recovered outside Roswell in July 1947 and an explanation for the Government's actions. There was no response.

A second request resulted in a reply from the Defense Department's congressional liaison office, referring the Congressman to the National Archives, on the grounds that all Air Force records from Project Blue Book were stored there. But no files on Roswell could be found in Blue Book records.

`I thought this would be a routine request handled in a routine way,' said Congressman Schiff during an interview in his office with Lawrence Moore and me for a British documentary in 1994. `I felt that the response I got was not routine - to just be referred to another agency without even an offer of assistance . . . That simple bit of courtesy is something frankly I would have expected from a Government agency. And I don't recall any such similar response where basically the request was just blown off'

In October 1993 Schiff decided to take up the matter with the Controller General, Charles Bowsher, head of the General Accounting Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress. Within a few days Schiff's office received a call from the GAO investigator (a specialist in military and intelligence matters) who had been assigned to the case.

The GAO investigation ran into difficulties at its outset. Colonel Larry Shockley, Director for Plans and Operations in the Secretary of Defense's Congressional liaison office, reportedly told the GAO investigator who indicated an interest in the Roswell case that `You've got no business getting into that.'

`My own inclination is not toward an extraterrestrial explanation,' Schiff told us in 1994:

There remains every possibility that this was a weather balloon accompanied by a public-relations fiasco. If it's not a weather balloon, I would look for something maybe being tested at White Sands Missile Range, which is nearby, for an explanation. But clearly a lot of questions have been raised - questions which suggest that, even if one does not believe in extraterrestrial visitation, this wasn't a weather balloon. From the statements of witnesses that I've seen and read, a number of individuals described that whatever it was that was recovered . . . the materials were under armed guard. And I think it's logical to say that weather balloons aren't normally flown in special planes under armed guard.

To Congressman Schiff the overall issue is not exactly what the device was, but the US Government's accounting for what it was. `I think everybody has a right to go to their Government and to see documents, unless there is a dear and immediate and present security reason why they may not be permitted to do so,' he says.

The Air Force Report:

In September 1994 - perhaps to pre-empt the GAO's findings, which were made available to Congressman Schiffs office in July 1995 - the Air Force issued a twenty-three-page Report of Air Force Research Regarding the `Roswell Incident'. The report concluded that a Project Mogul balloon array and instrument package were most probably responsible for the tales of a crashed flying saucer:

The Air Force research did not locate or develop any information that the `Roswell Incident' was a UFO event. All available official materials, although they do not directly address Roswell per se, indicate that the most likely source of the wreckage recovered from the Brazel Ranch was from one of the Project Mogul balloon trains . . . Additionally, it seems that there was over-reaction by Colonel Blanchard and Major Marcel, in originally reporting that a `flying disc' had been recovered when, at that time, nobody for sure knew what the term even meant since it had only been in use for a couple of weeks.

Likewise, there was no indication in official records from the period that there was heightened military operational or security activity which should have been generated if this was, in fact, the first recovery of material and/or persons from another world. The post-War US Military (or today's for that matter) did not have the capability to rapidly identify, recover, coordinate, cover-up, and quickly minimize public scrutiny of such an event. The claim that they did so without leaving even a little bit of a suspicious paper trail for 47 years is incredible . . .

Aside from the fact that key military records from the period have been destroyed illegally (see later) - thus sabotaging the chances of uncovering a paper trail - it is curious that the Air Force investigation failed to interview most of the dozens of still-surviving military and civilian witnesses (e.g. Brigadier General Arthur Exon or Glenn Dennis). Perhaps anticipating criticism for this neglect, the Air Force report commented:

Lastly, persons who have come forward and provided their names and made claims, may have, in good faith but in the `fog of time', misinterpreted past events. The review of Air Force records did not locate even one piece of evidence to indicate that the Air Force has had any part in an `alien' body recovery operation or continuing cover-up . . .

Most interestingly, as this report was being written, [Karl] Pflock published his own report [and] concluded from his research that the Brazel Ranch debris originally reported as a `flying disc' was probably debris from a Mogul balloon; however, there was a simultaneous incident that occurred not far away, that caused an alien craft to crash and that the [Army Air Forces] subsequently recovered three alien bodies therefrom. Air Force research did not locate any information to corroborate that this incredible incident occurred, however . . .

It is recommended that this document serve as the final Air Force report related to the Roswell matter, for the GAO, or any other inquiries.

Although the Air Force report was released by the USAF's Public Affairs Media Relations Division, its author was Colonel Richard Weaver, Director, Security and Special Program Oversight, of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations - an agency whose work involves counter- intelligence operations and deception, and which has a long record of deep involvement in the UFO problem.

Colonel Weaver's mid-1994 report draws unusual and prominent attention to its author's high-level organization within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, i.e. the department's secretariat. Weaver's office reports to the Secretary through but one intermediary, the Secretary of the Air Force Administrative Assistant (SAF/AA). Colonel Weaver was the SAF/AA deputy for security and investigative programs (SAF/AAZ), and the report itself says this. SAF/AAZ is, therefore, a very high-level organization within the entire Department of the Air Force that includes the Air Force as a military service. SAF/AAZ also is peculiar in that the secretariats of the other two military departments (Army and Navy) do not have organizations similar or equivalent to SAF/AAZ.

Located in Room 5D972 of the Pentagon, one floor above the office of the Secretary, SAF/AAZ's office is next door to the office of the Air Force's Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), which reports directly to the Secretary and to the Chief of Staff US Air Force. The SAB first held a meeting to discuss the UFO problem in 1948 (see Chapter 14). Variously, during the period 1946 to 1964, five persons with other connections to the UFO question served on the SAB: Dr Detlev Bronk; Lieutenant General James Doolittle; Dr H. P. Robertson; Dr George E. Valley Jr, and Dr Theodore von Karman.

The personnel complement of SAF/AAZ is interesting. In addition to Colonel Weaver (replaced later in 1994 by Lieutenant Colonel Eric Patterson), members include an executive assistant; an assistant for special programmes and oversight (likely the Special Access Programs, or `SAPs', mentioned in the report); two security officers (one civilian employee and one NCO); two administrative assistants (an NCO and an airman); and two special planners (both USAF officers). In Air Force parlance, the term `special plans' is a euphemism for deception as well as for `perception management' plans and operations (not to be confused with psychological operations (PSYOP).

Special planners plan and monitor for effectiveness Air Force deception operations that ordinarily support combat and other wartime operations. Typically, special plans provide diversionary, misleading and false manoeuvres, equipment and information, with the aim of distracting and confusing enemy commanders and their intelligence staffs during warfare operations. Perception management is an extension of deception on a broader or strategic scale, perhaps not always limited to warfare.

According to the position descriptions of the special planners in SAF/AAZ, apparently one plans while the other assesses effects and results. The other two military service secretariats do not appear to employ special planners.

In a report which debunks UFO research in general and that about the Roswell incidents in particular, it is curious that SAF/AAZ should draw new, unprecedented attention to itself among UFO researchers. On page 11, the report states, in effect, that if a UFO Special Access Program office were to exist in the Air Force, SAF/AAZ would be that office and that, looking within itself, it finds nothing of the kind. It would be hard to imagine a more self serving statement vis-a-vis the Congressional investigation of the Roswell incident. The Weaver report seems, regrettably, poorly contrived and defensively crafted to foil the outcome of the General Accounting Office's investigation.

The General Accounting Office Report:

In late July 1995 the GAO delivered its report to Congressman Steve Schiff's office. Rather than quoting from the actual report,39 I here reproduce part of the press release issued from SchifPs office in Washington, DC, dated 28 July 1995, which encapsulates the GAO's findings:

Congressman Steve Schiff today released the General Accounting Office (GAO) report detailing results of a records audit related to events surrounding a crash in 1947, near Roswell, New Mexico, and the military response.

The 20-page report is the result of constituent information requests to Congressman Schiff and the difficulty he had getting answers from the Department of Defense in the now 48-year-old controversy.

Schiff said important documents, which may have shed more light on what happened at Roswell, are missing. `The GAO report states that the outgoing messages from Roswell Army Air Field (RAAF) for this period of time were destroyed without proper authority.' Schiff pointed out that these messages would have shown how military officials in Roswell were explaining to their superiors exactly what happened.

`It is my understanding that these outgoing messages were permanent records, which should never have been destroyed. The GAO could not identify who destroyed the messages, or why.' But Schiff pointed out that the GAO estimates that the messages were destroyed over 40 years ago, making further inquiry about their destruction impractical . . .

The Roswell incident is unique in that so many have come forward with corroborative evidence, yet it is not an isolated case. Although the majority of military and civilian personnel reporting the incidents described have declined to have their names published, their testimony is equally deserving of our consideration.

Roswell Page 1!     Roswell Page 2!     Roswell Page 3!     Roswell Page 4!    

Read actual reprinted storys from the Roswell Daily Record dated July 8th, and 9th 1947.    

  


Contact Us
Submit Sighting
    Aliens111 Stargate Copyright ©2003 is a subsidiary of the UFO Gazette® Website, All Rights Reserved.