![]() |
![]() |
The ultimate website for understanding granular flows | |
![]() A Review of Plastic-Frictional Theory Part. 4 Constitutive Equations for Frictional Granular Flows |
You will find the basic facts about Plastic-Frictional Theories (Part. 4) - no details -. Detail is a matter of my current Ph.D. research and I will not show that here. If you wanna know more just email me or feel free to ask in the Volcano Discussion Forum. This general overview should help you to understand the modeling results and their interpretations that will be presented in this Granular Volcano Group Web Site. I purposely erased all the bibliographical references and detailed equations to keep the text simple and easy to read. If you have reached this page, please, be aware that this whole site may be better seen at the following urls: Those new urls will lead you to a faster, non-commercial, and pop-up free website. These are our official url addresses. Please, update your bookmarks. If you wish, you may see this specific page on the new website here: __________________________ We have seen on the preceding sections: On this page, you will find the last part of this Frictional-Plastic course: Please, dont forget to sign our Granular Volcano Guest Book. Done and updated by Sébastien Dartevelle, The WebMaster, June 29th, 2002. |
V. Constitutive Equations for Frictional Granular Flows
V.1. Beyond the extended von Mises Yield locus
Again, Id like to reemphasize that we need
a flow rule to make the connection between the rate-of-strain tensor and the
stress tensor when the material is just at yield
This can be done using
the Plastic Potential Flow we have just seen this in paragraph III (Part. 2 - Plastic Potential Theory Page).
Also, we now know from paragraph IV (Part. 3 - Critical State Theory Page) that if we adopt a yield locus
that has the properties of Figures 13 in the
|
![]() [Figure 13: Yield locus curve for a given bulk density, which is the combination of a failure locus curve and a consolidation locus curve] [At the intersection, we define a point called the critical state. The straight line passing through all the critical sates is named the Termination locus] [In Fig. 13C, I show two possible situations: dilatation path and consolidation path. Clearly, as the material deformed at yield, it will change from one yield locus to another till it reaches and finds its critical state] [See text for further explanation] |
![]() [Figure 14: Nearly the same as Fig. 13 but seen from the principal stress perspective. See Part 4. - Critical state Theory page for detailed explanation] |
As you may guess, changing the von Mises and Mohr-Coulomb law is not an easy task but it has been done in the past. To the best of my knowledge, there is only one function that can be used and have all the properties we have previously seen (dilatancy, consolidation, critical state in paragraph IV):
where IIdT is the second invariant of the deviator of the stress tensor,
and,
|
![]() [Figure 15: Modified von Mises yield function accounting for compressibility effects, failure and consolidation processes] [Compare with the extended von Mises conical yield function as shown on Fig.9 of paragraph II.2.] [One apex of this function lies at the origin as for the extended von Mises yield function, but in this case there is a second apex on the hydrostatic central axis] [Since the function P increases with the bulk density of the granular material, any yield surface containing smaller yield surfaces represents a higher density than the ones it contains] |
From Eq. 1 and knowing IIdT (Eq. 1_3), we can find the radius of this yield function (for any fixed value of P, see Fig.15), which is:
At the two apex of this function, the radius is zero (on the hydrostatic axis for
All this can also be shown if we apply the Plastic Potential Theory to this new yield function. Indeed,
So, we see that the divergence of the velocity will be positive or negative depending on the sign of
Of course, it is clear that the use of the Plastic Potential theory assumed that the Mohr-Coulomb/von Mises approach is not right for such a theory. Therefore, we had to modify it You may like that or not, it is as it is.
Now, what I want is to use the preceding results for using them in a computer model, that is for solving the momentum equation. So, I have to rearrange Eq.3 in order to properly and easily use it. So, what I am gonna do, its a little bit algebra but dont worry, I think it is a lot of fun youll see.
You may see that Eq. 3b may be generalized as:
And using Eq. 3c, we may rewrite Eq. 4 as:
where
Notice the difference with Eq. 5c. Sometimes Eq. 6 is named the Levy flow rule, which can only be applied for incompressible medium (this is not good for granular flow). Notice that both flow rules imply the co-axiality between the stress directions and rate-of-strain directions since the shear rate-of-strain is zero on plane where the shear stress is zero (Please, if you do not know what co-axiality means you must read the previous section of this course: Part.2 - Plastic Potential Theory). The normality conditions is of course true since both flow rules are derived from the associated Plastic Potential theory (again see Part.2: Plastic Potential Theory Page).
Now, we know that the Pitman-Schaeffer-Gray-Stiles yield function states that (see Eq. 1):
It is worth noting that the Euclidian norm of the deviator of the stress tensor is:
And we can also rewrite the Levy-von Mises flow rule as (see Eq. 5c):
Therefore, taking Eq.7, and using Eq.9 along with Eq. 3c, we have:
Cool, so what? Well, good question, why the hell we have done all this? Typically in a computer model of granular flow we must solve a momentum equation in which one term will account for the momentum contribution from all the stresses within the flow. The total stress can be written as:
where Eq.11a is the total stress tensor, Eq.11b
is the spherical part of the stress tensor, Eq.11c is the deviatoric part of
the stress tensor, Eq.11d is the rate-of-strain tensor (note the minus sign
which is explained by the fact that compression is positive following our sign convention),
Cool, and now the shear frictional viscosity a piece of cake! From the Levy-von Mises flow rule (Eq. 5c), we know:
Voila! Were done folks! And the nice thing
is that a close inspection of Eq.12 and Eq.13 show that the frictional stress
is independent of the rate-of-strain tensor (D) as required by the
frictional theory. Indeed, if the components of D are multiplied by a
factor, the components of the stress tensor remain unchanged (because at the denominator we have IIdD and
V.2. Within the extended von Mises Yield locus
As we have seen in the previous paragraph, we cannot use the Mohr-Coulomb/von Mises yield function with the plastic potential theory as it leads to physical inconsistencies. Therefore, we had to modify the von Mises theory in order to make them work within the plastic potential. This is kinda done often, and it has my favor as I think it makes sense in terms of physics. On the other hand, in some conditions, we may consider to keep the von Mises yield function. For instance, if we are only interested into failure processes at very high concentration, the extended von Mises/Mohr-Coulomb yield function may suffice for our needs.
Lets see some properties of the extended conical von Mises conical yield function associated with the Plastic Potential Theory (we have already seen some):
As a reminder, we see that the divergence is always positive predicting a continued dilatation (Eq.14c). Now, in using Eq.14c, we can generalize Eq.14b as:
where IIdD and IIdT are the second invariant of the deviator of the rate-of-strain and the stress tensors respectively. The last equation is again the famous Levy-von Mises flow rule, which is a direct consequence of the compressibility of the material in applying the Plastic Potential Theory. We know at yield we must have a conical function given by:
And as in the previous paragraph (V.1.), we note that the Euclidian norm of the deviator of the stress tensor is (for the extended von Mises case):
Now, thanks to the Levy-von Mises flow rule, we have:
Now, in the previous paragraph (V.1.), we
have seen that it is possible to find an expression for the bulk density since we knew that
Now, as we have done in the previous paragraph, we want to use those results for solving the momentum equations in a computer model for instance. Typically, we must know the total stress at any time anywhere. The total stress can be written as:
Since, the bulk viscosity is assumed to be zero, the viscous stress tensor is traceless and is given by Eq.19c. Now we just have to find an expression for the shear viscosity in using Eq.19c with Eq. 18:
A close inspection of Eq.19 and Eq.20 shows that the frictional stress is independent of the rate-of-strain tensor (D) as required. Indeed, if the components of D are multiplied by a factor, the components of the stress tensor remain unchanged.
Ooooaaaaaah! Its over, were done! I dont know if you realize that it took me three months of hard labor for finding all the books, papers, articles and writing down all this (besides drawing all the figures) hope you found this frictional course useful. Please, let me know what you think: email me Now since it is the summer time here in Michigan (June 29th, 2002), Im gonna take a few days off (I'm kidding)
If you have enjoyed this Plastic-Frictional (Part 4) webpage, pleaaase, before you leave, sign my Guestbook. It's all I ask!
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
You may also enjoy those pages: | Guestbook | Discussion Forum | Chatroom | Volcano Links | Granular Links | Awards | Logos | Who is the Webmaster? | |
|||||||||
_____________________________________________________ Any problems or comments with this web site can be reported to the Web Master. |