Liberty Institute, New Delhi
"Where the mind is without fear ... ..."
Liberty
Institute Main Page | Liberty Features
Liberty
Articles | Liberty Opeds | Champions
of Liberty| In Defence of Liberty
Liberty to Trade
News from Seattle
Free Trade | Costs
of Protectionism | Agriculture | Child
Labour | E-Commerce | Environment
Liberty Institute Briefing Paper on Trade and Development
November 1999
Costs of Protectionism:
How Indian Consumers & Workers Lost Out
In 1947, India's share of the world trade was 1.5%.
In 1998, it was estimated to be 0.8%.
Per capita income in 1998 was approximately $400 ($900 under PPP)
Indian Economic Philosophy for the Past 50 years
-
National self-sufficiency
-
Import substitution
-
Trade is a zero-sum game
Basic rationale for restricting trade:
-
Protecting domestic manufacturers
-
Encouraging domestic manufacturing and employment
-
Ensuring quality and safety for the benefit of consumers
-
Promoting indigenous growth of knowledge and technology
Consequences of protectionism:
-
High price, low quality
-
Low levels of competition
-
Technological stagnation
-
Knowhow dependent on policy of subsidies
-
Smaller market, lower volumes
-
Perpetual Scarcity
Loss to consumers - Choice, Price, Quality, Access
Characteristics of the Protected Domestic Market:
Organised sector -
-
Entry barrier (licence and permit raj or rule, now being partly dismantled)
-
Higher fiscal and regulatory costs of operating in the formal market
(while tariffs and taxes may be falling, regulatory, legal and transaction
costs are increasing)
Growth of small / informal and even illegal sectors (particularly
in established manufacturing areas) (fly-by-night operators)
-
Policies induce companies to stay small!!
-
Fewer people are employed, minimal benefits accrue to communities
-
Companies avoid regulatory costs incurred by those that play by the
rules
-
- Low quality
-
- Low price
-
- High transaction costs for consumers
Rise of vested interests
-
Formal sectors - seek legal protection
-
Informal sectors - seek administrative collusion
-
Illegal sectors - seek continuation of protectionist policies to ensure
their own high profits
Consequences of distorting trade -
-
International Trade: Smuggling
-
Domestics market: Black-market
-
International relations: Political tension is common among countries
that do not trade. (India and Pakistan barely trades, and are permanently
under the cloud of war.)
Result:
-
Social level:
- Loss of respect for laws
- Creation of established channels of smuggling, black marketing
and racketeering
- Use of these same channels for many other more insidious activities
(terrorism)
-
Economic level:
- Economic inefficiency
- Flouting of economic regulations - loss to exchequer
-
Environmental level:
- Environmental inefficiency / degradation
- Flouting of environment regulations, free riding
Trade Restriction is a Negative Sum Game
-
Consumers lose out on better quality, lower prices and low transaction
costs associated with brand products.
-
Manufacturers lose out by failing to capture larger markets with better
share, having less opportunities to innovate or introduce new products
Traders lose out on account of small size of the market
-
Service sector lose out for similar reasons
-
Workers lose out as there are fewer jobs on offer
Required Policy Direction:
If the interest of consumers are to be paramount, and since all
parties in an economy are also consumers in their private capacities, then
policies must reflect the following objectives.
-
Free trade
-
Elimination of tariffs
-
Reduction of regulatory costs
-
Unrestrained imports (even second hand goods or waste products)
Economic consequences of Free Trade:
-
Advantages of economies of scale
-
A more dynamic and competitive domestic economy
-
Inflow of new innovations and technology
-
Economic efficiency will boost environmental quality
-
Realisation that domestic manufacturing are not the prime source of
employment
-
More employment in the area of trade and services outside the organised
sectors
-
Substantial investments are attracted to open and expanding markets
Conclusion:
-
Free trade is a positive sum game.
-
Producers compete to improve their products at lower prices
-
Consumers have a wide range of choices.
-
A competitive market economy improves the social and environmental conditions.
-
Free trade is fair trade
Consumer is truly the King in an open market. Greater the choice, the
more powerful the consumer becomes.
In contrast, creating protectionist barriers, at the international
and domestic levels, have led to high cost and inefficient economy, where
the consumer has become the pauper.
####################
Comments and suggestions are welcome. Please write to Liberty
Institute.
Free trade is fair trade, says an international
coalition of organisations and think tanks, International
Consumers for Civil Society (ICCS).
Top of Page
Liberty Institute Home Page