Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT GLOBALIZATION
AND ALTERNATIVES


 
Ideology
What is "neoism"
Institutions
WTO
IMF
World Bank

NAFTA, FTAA
G8
Trends
Race to the Bottom
Misc.
Rich Nations
Asia
Europe
USA
Eastern Europe
Poor Nations
Africa
The Americas
Alternatives and Proposals
           
Give credit to:
Z Magazine
Noam Chomsky
Susan George
ATTAC
Co-Op America
oneworld.net
Amnesty International
Gregory Palast
Human Rights Watch
Inter Press Service
Electronic Policy Network
American Prospect
Indymedia
Steve Kangas RIP
Mike Huben
authors of
Anarchist FAQ
Public Citizen
The Peoples Summits
World Development Movement
Global Exchange
plus a few zillion others.
Send Blame to:
Art Sankey

 

SECTION FOUR: The rich nations - from development to decline under neoism

Are low wages part of development?

It is strange to see Americans arguing this, because "Neither Germany nor the United States industrialized by competing against Britain on the basis of low wages," Amsden points out, and the same was true of Japan

In Germany and other successful economies, worker conditions are good and benefits are high.

A study of industrial productivity by MIT specialists shows that Germany, Japan, and other countries with the worker-friendly "craft tradition" with more "direct participation of skilled workers in production decisions" have been more successful than the United States, with its tradition of keeping workers unskilled and unimportant in the "mass-production model".

This makes sense: why bother developing by buying modern machines when it is cheaper to just take advantage of "flexiable" labor?

(Footnotes: 5 Francis, CSM, May 14, 1992. Amsden, op.cit. Huelshoff, Sperling, in Merkl, Federal. Ronald van de Krol, FT, Sept. 28; Economist, May 23, 1992. Dertouzos et al., Made in America.)


FAIR USE NOTICE: You can copy this info as long as you do not charge money for it. In legal:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: US CODE COLLECTION If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.