|
Government
policy |
|
The Green Paper
- February 2001
Quotes from
Estelle Morris, David Blunkett
The White Paper
- September 2001
Education Bill
Standing Committee - January 2002
Education Bill
Report Stage - February 2002
Second Reading
in House of Lords - March 2002
Filling Empty
Places in Anglican Schools - April 2002
Filling Empty
Places in Catholic Schools - Lords Committee Stage - May 2002
|
|
The Green Paper - February
2001
In his Green
Paper Schools - building on success David Blunkett,
then the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, was very favourable
towards the idea of expanding the number of faith-based schools:
4.10. Schools are now responsible
for their own performance, for the conduct of the school and its discipline,
for the control of school premises, the repair and maintenance of buildings
and, in the case of foundation and voluntary aided schools, for admissions.
We have also helped to ensure that governors, heads and teachers have
the right support, from reformed Education Authorities and from elsewhere,
to do their jobs as effectively as they can. All schools now enjoy many
of the freedoms that were formerly only available to the grant-maintained
sector. The 1998 legislation gives schools greater choice about their
category, and permits any community school that wishes, with local agreement,
to propose transfer from community to foundation status. . .
4.18. We have increased the
number and variety of schools within the state system supported by the
churches and other major faith groups. Some 560 secondary schools are
now provided by the Church of England or the Catholic Church. For the
first time, Muslim, Sikh and Greek Orthodox schools have been brought
inside the state system, and are being funded on the same basis as,
for example, Church of England and Catholic schools have been for some
time. We have also increased the number of Jewish schools. And we have
indicated that we are ready to discuss with other community or privately-run
schools the conditions on which they might enter the publicly-provided
sector.
4.19. Schools supported by
the churches and other major faith groups are, of course, valued by
members of those groups. They also have a good record of delivering
a high-quality of education to their pupils and many parents welcome
the clear ethos of these schools. We therefore wish to welcome more
schools provided by the churches and other major faith groups and by
other voluntary and community groups, where there is clear local demand
from parents and the community. We are pleased, for example, to see
that Lord Dearing's report to the Archbishops' Council recommends that
the Church of England increase the number of secondary schools that
it supports, particularly in areas where there are few or no Anglican
schools. We know other faith communities are also interested in extending
their contribution to education. We intend to change the capital
funding arrangements to make them more favourable to enable this to
occur (see Chapter 6). The new school sponsorship proposals set out
in paragraph 4.23 will also be of interest to faith groups and schools
seeking to acquire faith sponsors.
[Emphasis added]
Return
to top
|
|
Estelle Morris, the
new Secretary of State for Education, was asked about faith schools on
Breakfast with Frost, on 15 July 2001
DAVID FROST: Lots of people
like in Bradford, people of Bradford, and so on, say, the last thing
we want is one faith schools, we want more integration and not more
faith schools.
ESTELLE MORRIS: I've thought
a lot about that over the last week since what we heard about Bradford.
And I think there's a number of things, we wouldn't open faith schools
unless that's what parents want. It's a response to what parents want
for their children. But I think the way Bradford's been described, we
need to do some serious thinking…
In September, David Blunkett,
the previous Secretary of State and now Home Secretary, said on Channel
4 TV:
"Should we have ethnically
divided schools? Should we have faith schools for the Islam and Sikh
community and Hindus when we have them for the Jewish and for the various
Christian denominations, or would that create a divide? Faced with that
contradiction I modestly agreed to some schools from faiths coming into
the state and being public, but by doing so risked actually continuing
to reinforce that divide. So I plead guilty to the contradictions and
to the schizophrenia that we're all faced with."
[I'm not racist but…,
C4, 22/9/01]
|
|
The White Paper - September
2001
However, by September the enthusiasm
had become very muted. The riots in northern towns, defined to some extent
by colour and religion, and the events of September 11 had turned not
only the public but many in Parliament and the Government against the
idea of expanding faith-school provision. Estelle Morris, the new Secretary
of State for Education and Skills, said in her White
Paper Schools - achieving success:
We
will support inclusive faith schools
5.30 Faith schools have a
significant history as part of the state education system, and play
an important role in its diversity. Over the last four years, we have
increased the range of faith schools in the maintained sector, including
the first Muslim, Sikh and Greek Orthodox schools. There are also many
independent faith schools and we know that some faith groups are interested
in extending their contribution to state education. We wish to welcome
faith schools, with their distinctive ethos and character, into the
maintained sector where there is clear local agreement. Guidance
to School Organisation Committees will require them to give proposals
from faith groups to establish schools the same consideration as those
from others, including LEAs. Decisions to establish faith schools
should take account of the interests of all sections of the community.
5.31 We note that Lord Dearing’s
report to the Archbishops’ Council recommends that the Church of England
increase significantly the number of secondary school places it supports.
Where there is local support, we will welcome that. We want these
schools to be inclusive, and welcome the recommendation that Church
of England schools should serve the whole community, not confining admission
to Anglicans. We want faith schools that come into the maintained sector
to add to the inclusiveness and diversity of the school system and to
be ready to work with non-denominational schools and those of other
faiths.
[Emphasis added]
Return
to top
|
|
Education Bill Standing
Committee - January 2002
Although the Education Bill
touches only marginally on the question of
faith schools, MPs took the opportunity to voice strong objections to
expanding the faith-school sector in the standing committee debate on
January 10. Ivan Lewis MP, a Parliamentary Under-Secretary
at the Department for Education and Skills, replied, stating the Government's
policy:
. . . We would all accept
that the behaviour and actions of people in Northern Ireland in recent
weeks is intolerable and heinous. The problems of Northern Ireland are
much more complex and cannot be related merely to faith-based education.
That was my point in relation
to Bradford, Burnley and Oldham. There are deep-rooted difficulties
in some of our towns, and we have a responsibility to address them.
I do not part company from those who have identified faith schools as
an issue in the debate about why those disturbances occurred and how
we bring together people from different religions, cultures and backgrounds.
However, some people
have claimed that faith-based education is the primary cause of such
difficulties in communities and society. I do not accept that premise.
I remind the Committee of
the basis on which a new school must apply if it wishes to establish
itself in the maintained sector. It would have to apply to a local school
organisation committee, which would then decide whether the creation
of the new school was in the interests of, broadly, the local community
and, narrowly, the family of schools. The hon. Member for Harrogate
and Knaresborough [Phil Willis MP, Liberal Democrat spokesperson on
education] knows that the Secretary of State has given some initial
suggestions on the guidance that will be available to those committees,
although more detail will follow.
That guidance will make it
clear that a new faith-based school must demonstrate either a partially
inclusive admissions policy or, if it does not feel that that is appropriate,
a commitment to and strategy for working with other schools in the area
of another faith or no faith. A new school must be approved by the school
organisation committee, which would make a statement about whether establishment
of the school would be in the best interests of the local community.
The decision would be made according to guidance from the Secretary
of State, and would address the issues of collaboration and partnership
and the need to bring young people of different religious and cultural
backgrounds together.
The introduction in September
of citizenship education as a statutory part of the national curriculum
will be an important step forward in encouraging young people to think
about and discuss mutual respect and tolerance of people from different
religious and cultural backgrounds.
Read
the full debate on the Parliament website (see column 336 for
start)
Read
the extracts about faith schools in pdf format
The fig-leaf nature of the
"commitment to and strategy for working with other schools in the
area of another faith or no faith" is shown by the plans for 20 pairs
of mainly white or Asian schools in Bradford to work together - for six
lessons a year! Barbara
Ford, head teacher at St Anthony's Catholic Primary, which is linking
up for these brief lessons with the mostly Muslim Farnham Primary, said:
"The children think it's absolutely wonderful." [National
Secular Society Newsline 20/10/02]
Return
to top
|
|
Education Bill Report Stage
- February 2002
When the Bill returned to the
floor of the House, there was a full debate on two similar amendments
designed to ensure that faith schools reserved a minority of their places
for children who were not of the relevant faith. The amendments were rejected
but with a substantial rebellion by Government backbenchers: there were
45 Labour backbench "rebels". For
the text of the debate, click here.
|
|
Education Bill: Second Reading
in House of Lords
No new statement of Government
policy was forthcoming when the Bill was introduced in the House of Lords,
but considerable doubts about the wisdom of encouraging faith schools
were expressed in measured tones by many speakers and more outspokenly
by Lord (Roy) Hattersley. Read
the relevant extracts in pdf format.
Return
to top
|
|
Filling Empty Places in
Anglican Schools - Lords Committee Stage
The Government is attempting
to defuse the row over faith-based education by changing the law over
admissions to Church of England schools. It has drafted an amendment to
the education Bill . . . forcing Anglican schools to consult diocesan
boards of education every year over their admissions policies.
The amendment, which was suggested
by the Church of England, stops short of forcing its schools to admit
pupils of other faiths or none. But the church hierarchy, which says most
of its schools have inclusive admissions policies, believes it will be
a powerful lever. . .
The Rev David Jennings, rector
of Burbage, Leicestershire, who opposes church schools, said: "This is
the Government, possibly with the support of he CofE board of education,
struggling to present a facade of inclusivity."
Times Education Supplement,
3/4/02
Return
to top
|
|
Filling Empty Places in
Catholic Schools - Lords Committee Stage
The Government plan to amend
the Education Bill to prevent religious schools (the known examples are
Roman Catholic schools) refusing to fill spare places with pupils who
are not of the relevant faith. Baroness Ashton of Upholland, the junior
education minister, said:
"We believe that allowing schools
to keep places empty when there is demand for them is at odds with our
aim. We do not believe that it is an efficient use of resources for places
to remain empty in some schools if overall demand for places in a local
education authority's area can be met only by the authority having to
meet the cost of providing additional school places elsewhere. Empty places
mean less funding for the schools themselves and fewer resources available
for children in those schools.
"In practice, there are very
few Section 91 arrangements in place. Many Catholic schools and their
dioceses already take the view that it is better to fill all their places
by admitting children of other faiths or denominations or of no faith
than to keep places empty. As the noble Lord, Lord Alton, said, about
14 per cent of children in Roman Catholic primary schools and more than
20 per cent of children in Roman Catholic secondary schools are not Catholic.
I am able to announce today that we shall be bringing forward an amendment
at Report stage to repeal Section 91 of the School Standards and Framework
Act 1998. That will end the possibility of faith schools under-subscribed
by faith adherents agreeing arrangements with their local education authority
to keep places empty."
House of Lords Hansard, 14
May 2002 : Columns 179-180
To
read all references to faith schools in the House of Lords Committee Stage,
click here for pdf document - NB: about 50 pages.
Return
to top
|
|