Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Emerson Center for

Spiritual Awakening

New Thought based in ancient wisdom ... 

the timeless teachings of

Religious Science

 

Dr. Susanne Freeborn, Senior Minister

Rev. Linda S. Siddall, Assistant Minister

 

 

Web Page Index

[ Home ]

[Current Sunday Topics & News]

 [ Sunday Lessons 

 Index of Texts ]

[ About Us ]

[New Thought Links ]

[ Spiritual Services ]

[ Sample Order of Service ]

[ Classes & Study Groups ]

[ Emerson Online Studies ]

[ Site Directory ]

[ Press Releases ]

[ Driving Directions or Information Requests ]

 

Guest Book

 

Articles of Interest

 

[ What is Time? ]

[ Laws of Success ]

A Little Light: Quotations Collection ]

 

Ancient Wisdom Taught in a Modern Way!

 REALITY and APPEARANCES,

How DO we tell the difference?

01-28-01

 Readings:

ONLY ONE MIND 

There is no such thing as your mind, my mind, his mind, her mind and God's Mind; there is just Mind in which we all live, move and have our being. There is Mind and nothing but Mind. We think of Conscious Mind and Spirit as One and the Same. 

Things are ideas. What else could they be? There is nothing out of which to make things, except ideas. In the beginning we behold nothing visible; there is only an infinite possibility, a Limitless Imagination, a Consciousness; the only action of this Consciousness being idea. 

That which we call our subjective mind is, in reality, our identity in Infinite Mind; in other words, it is the result of our mental attitudes. It is our mental atmosphere or center in universal Subjective Mind, in which are retained all the images, impressions, inherited tendencies and race suggestions as far as we accept them. 

We see, then, that this is the Medium through which everything comes to us. [i]

 Meaning and reality were not hidden somewhere behind things, they were in them, in all of them.

Hermann Hesse, Author of Siddartha 

The mind verily is the world (samsara)

One should purify it strenuously.

One assumes the form of that which is in one’s mind.

This is the eternal secret.

Maitri-Upanishad

 

REALITY and APPEARANCES, How DO we tell the difference?

Today, we are going to learn something about thinking.  One of the big ideas of Religious Science is that if we change our thinking our lives will also change.  Philosophy has a good many terms that apply to how we think and a basic understanding of their meanings is very helpful to us in learning how to think effectively.  We’ll go about exploring these ideas as simply and clearly as possible today.  Part of what makes life mysterious is simply our inability to think clearly about it.

So how do we think?  How do we tell the difference between reality and appearances?  Aesop, the great Greek fabulist said, “Outside show is a poor substitute for inner worth.”  Since he lived over 2500 years ago, you can surmise that as a species we human beings have had an idea that there might be some difference for a very long time.  How do we learn to discern this difference?  Let’s talk about that.  In the Bhagavad Gita, a part of the epic Sanskrit poem the Mahabharata, that was written some time around 400 years BCE, we are told that,

The non permanent appearance of happiness and distress, and their disappearance in due course, are like the appearance and disappearance of summer and winter seasons.

Some things just seem to come and go and come again. 

Most of us think that something is real whenever our senses bear out its existence. If we see, smell, hear, taste or feel it we generally come to accept it. In our thinking and speaking, we tend to make no distinction at all between reality and existence. Yet, ancient wisdom teaches us that not everything that is real is in existence, and everything in existence is not real.  I will say that again: Not everything that is real is in existence, and everything in existence is not real.  John Lennon was saying a great deal when he said, “Reality leaves a lot to the imagination.”

The very language we use can sometimes thwart our efforts at creating a distinction between reality, that which is, and appearance, that which seems to exist.  Commonly, we blur these distinctions by using the terms reality and existence interchangeably. Today, we will distinguish reality as that which is enduring, eternal, and unchangeable, while all things that exist are always subject to change in some way.  Ernest Holmes defined change as “The appearance and disappearance of forms.”[ii]  Jesus cautioned us not to judge or evaluate things according to appearances but to judge righteously, which is to say use our power of spiritual discernment, to rely upon spiritual principle.

It is said that those of us who practice New Thought are Idealists, no matter whether we consider ourselves to be Christian or otherwise. What does Idealist mean?  In Philosophy they tell us that Idealists believe in the power of ideas as the fundamental basis of all that appears, or as we defined before, that which is subject to change. So, if we think of this in terms of our metaphysics, our thinking, our ideas, shape our lives.  This also means that we are saying that eternality is not in the thing, but in the power that generates the thing. Ideas are the progeny of Spirit; they are the original, primary, thought of Being. 

This is why Spirit is referred to as Divine or Creative Mind, First Cause, and sometimes as simply Source. Ideas are made in the image and likeness of God. God is invisible. Ideas are invisible. God is intangible. Ideas are intangible. God is unlimited. Ideas are unlimited. God is good. Ideas are good.  

The British author, Gilbert K. Chesterton, said:

“Facts as facts do not always create a spirit of reality, because reality is a spirit.”

Ideas are formed by consciousness. In order for an idea to become tangible or manifest, it must first be formed by consciousness. No form contains or restricts an idea. Two spiritual faculties determine the possibility and shape of any idea. These are faith and imagination. Faith sees and handles the idea and says “YES!” to its possibility of manifestation and imagination shapes it into a form that is acceptable to the thinker.  In Religious Science, we sometimes refer this to as Love and Law.  

Now here is an interesting thing, no thinker in the past has ever exhausted any idea! That is why we have an ever rising spiral of spiritual progress and why the greatest demonstration in any area of life has yet to be achieved.  Consciousness and its expression continue to develop.  We are clearly not done yet; the perfect evidence is that we are still here experiencing something outside of our selves, still developing.

Idealism is the polar opposite of materialism. Materialism has nothing to do with how much stuff you have.  Most people erroneously label wealthy people as materialists. The fact is that more poor people are materialists because they think that the answer to their problems is in acquiring more and “better” things. 

There is an old story told of a man who heard that there was a holy man who could initiate him into the mysteries of life. He traveled a great distance to meet with him. When he arrived, he was thoroughly disgusted by what he saw. There were lavish tapestries, silver and gold articles and other things that seemed to exhibit crass materialism. When he was granted an audience with the Great Teacher, he began to berate him about his lavish lifestyle. The teacher remained silent. In the midst of his tirade, smoke began to pour from another room. It was obvious that something was burning; yet, the Great Teacher remained still and silent. However, the seeker became anxious and wondered why the master was not trying to save the valuable items. The teacher understood that the value was not in the tapestries and silver decorations, no matter how expensive they were. For he knew that his supply was not dependent on their existence. The student who pretentiously regarded the things as a hindrance to spiritual mastery was upset when their existence was threatened.

Idealism leads to monism, which is the belief in one power and presence in the universe.  When we understand the power of ideas and our ability to handle ideas, we have just been given the key to becoming a person who knows no envy! Such a person recognizes that nothing is being held back from them, nor would it ever be! No one can delay you from succeeding when you know that you are some part of God. Your conscious contact with God is your connection to all of God’s ideas. 

Materialists look at what has already been manifested and demand to get their fair share. They see the fruits of abundance as if these objects of desire are on someone else’s tree, and think that they ought to be given some part of the harvest. From a spiritual point of view, this is absolutely ineffective. If we have to get  what we want from outside of ourselves, it isn’t ours in the first place!  What we really need is not for someone out there to give it to us, but the wisdom of truly understanding the power that is innately ours. From James 1: 5-8:

"If any of you is lacking in wisdom, ask God, who gives to all generously and ungrudgingly, and it will be given you. But ask in faith, never doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, driven and tossed by the wind; for the doubter, being double —minded and unstable in every way, must not expect to receive anything from the Lord."

So we might ask then, if God is so good, so generous, why is there suffering in the world? In fact, why do we suffer? Traditional theologians answer this with what is called theodicy. This is a defense of God's goodness and omnipotence in view of the existence of evil, and is often answered with the concept of dualism. In other words, there is a good power and an evil one.  The collective consciousness is brimming with the idea of a contest in which the forces for evil often wins. There is no power in opposition to God, there is only God, and all exists within God.

As idealists who believe in the One Power, there is another way to process our experiences. We can use the dialectical method, which was developed by Hegel. It validates the scripture for today, which states that all things work together for good. We noted earlier in the lesson that the major characteristic of all appearances is that they are ever-changing. All appearances are effects that change continually. In the Eastern traditions, this is often referred to as illusion or Maya.

Never try to avoid changes in your experiences. You are not your experience. Your experiences reflect your consciousness at any given time. Yet, your consciousness is divinely intended to expand or grow, and such development will bring about changes in your experience.

Whenever a person strives, by the help of dialectic, to start in pursuit of every reality by a simple process of reason, independent of all sensuous information -- never flinching, until by an act of the pure intelligence he has grasped the real nature of good -- he arrives at the very end of the intellectual world. 

Plato

Because it is so useful in our coming to know ultimate reality, and ourselves, let’s discuss briefly how the dialectical method can be summarized in three equally essential parts.  Whenever we begin to think about anything, we begin with an idea.  In dialectal method, we call that idea a thesis.

1.     A Thesis can be defined as the least adequate point of your development. This is the untested idea, which you seek to explore or prove, and it provides a place to begin.  In a personal way, this is where you are now, which is not your final stage of development in consciousness. 

2.     The Antithesis is the place, where you encounter resistance or opposing ideas that are in conflict with your thesis.  You might say this is the part we don’t like sometimes, because it causes us to move from the passive entertainment of an idea into the final part of the dialectical process, synthesis.

3.     Synthesis is the dialectic combination of thesis and antithesis, and arrives at a higher stage of truth than either position could have alone. It requires seeing the truth and falsehood in both positions and all the ideas associated with them.  Georg Hegel’s idea was that each dialectical process results in the synthesis of a new thesis, and the process continues until one arrives at the point of pure being.

Now let’s look at this process and see if it properly belongs in our New Thought Idealism.  We in Religious Science have a catch phrase we quote from Ernest Holmes, “Change your thinking, change your life.”  Right off the bat we can see that this dialectical method may be extremely useful in making a change in our thinking that really does stick! 

While studying and trying to find illustrative quotations for this talk, I found this quotation from Abraham Lincoln, one of my heroes, “Every person is responsible for his own looks after 40.”  Thinking back to that Aesop quotation I shared with you earlier, “Outside show is a poor substitute for inner worth” It seems to me that we must then reap the appearance of the choices we have made and if we are at all fortunate, we will have within us the knowledge of reality.  We will know the truth of our being.  It cannot be too plainly stated that Spirit, or Conscious Intelligence, is the only Self-Assertive Principle in the universe. "Spirit is the power that knows Itself," and is the only power that is Self-Knowing. Everything else is subject to Spirit. The sole and only operation of Spirit is through Its Word. The Word, acting as Law through Substance, produces Creation. [iii]  This we find at the end of the first lesson in the 1926 Science of Mind text, and from it, we begin to learn how to think in a manner that truly does change our life!

Thank you for being here today!

[i] THE SCIENCE OF MIND 
A Complete Course of Lessons in the Science of Mind and Spirit 
By ERNEST SHURTLEFF HOLMES 
COPYRIGHT, 1926.
 [ii] Ibid
 [iii] Ibid

 
 

 

Warmly Celebrating Spiritual Growth and Abundant Life in an Open Community

Send mail to Dr. Susanne Freeborn with questions or comments about Emerson Center or this  web site.
Copyright © 2000-2002 Emerson Center for Spiritual Awakening
Last modified: August 23, 2002