Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
 

The Trinity



 
 

O people of the Book! commit no excesses in your religion: nor say of Allah aught but truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an Apostle of Allah and His Word which He bestowed on Mary and a Spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His Apostles. Say not "Trinity": desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is One God: glory be to him: (for Exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs. [Holy Qur'an 4:171]

We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of Apostles; We gave Jesus the son of Mary clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit. [Holy Qur'an 2:87]


".......It is difficult in the second half of the 20th century to offer a clear, objective and straightforward account of the revelation, doctrinal evolution, and theological elaboration of the Mystery of the trinity. Trinitarian discussion, Roman Catholic as well as other, present a somewhat unsteady silhouette. Two things have happened. There is the recognition on the part of exegetes and Biblical theologians, including a constantly growing number of Roman Catholics, that ONE SHOULD NOT SPEAK OF TRINITARIANISM IN THE NEW TESTAMENT WITHOUT SERIOUS QUALIFICATION. There is also the closely parallel recognition on the part of historians of dogma and systematic theologians that when one does speak of an unqualified Trinitarianism, one has moved from the period of Christian origins to, say, THE LAST QUADRANT OF THE 4TH CENTURY. IT WAS ONLY THEN THAT WHAT MIGHT BE CALLED THE DEFINITIVE TRINITARIAN DOGMA 'ONE GOD IN THREE PERSONS' BECAME THOROUGHLY ASSIMILATED INTO CHRISTIAN LIFE AND THOUGHT... it was the product of 3 centuries of doctrinal development" (emphasis added).  (The New Catholic Encyclopaedia, Volume XIV, p. 295.)

If the "Trinity" is the true nature of God, then why did Jesus (pbuh) leave his closest and dearest followers so completely and utterly baffled and lost that they never even realized the "true" nature of God? Why did he leave them steeped in such black darkness that neither they nor their children, nor yet their children's children would ever come to recognize the "true" nature of the One they are to worship? Do we really want to allege that Jesus was so thoroughly incompetent in the discharge of his duties that he left his followers in such utter chaos that it would take them fully three centuries after his departure to finally piece together the nature of the One whom they are to worship? Why did Jesus never, even once, just say "God, the Holy Ghost and I are three Persons in one Trinity. It is a mystery. Worship all of us as one and have blind faith"?  Couldn't it possibly be that he didn't say it nor did he teach it BECAUSE IT ISN'T TRUE ?!

Some people try and make the case that Jesus (pbuh) taught the disciples the concept of the "trinity" in secret and that these "secret" teachings were then made public knowledge many years later. However, in advancing this unsubstantiated claim these people forget Jesus' explicit refusal of this claim. He publicly announced:

"Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing." [John 18:20]

If God is a trinity then God Himself would have told us so clearly, directly, and without beating around the bush, just as He clearly tells us that He is One in so many places in the Bible, for example:

"Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I [am] he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, [even] I, [am] the LORD; and beside me [there is] no saviour." [Isaiah 43:10-11]

"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God [is] one LORD:" [Deuteronomy 6:4]

etc.

"Because the Trinity is such an important part of later Christian doctrine, it is striking that the term does not appear in the New Testament. Likewise, the developed concept of three coequal partners in the Godhead found in later creedal formulations cannot be clearly detected within the confines of the canon (Bible)." (The Oxford Companion to the Bible, Bruce Metzger, pp. 782-783)

In "The Dictionary of the Bible," bearing the Nihil Obstat, Imprimatur, and Imprimi Potest (official Church seals of approval), we read: 

"the trinity of God is defined by the Church as the belief that in God are three persons who subsist in one nature. That belief as so defined was reached only in the 4th and 5th centuries AD and hence is not explicitly and formally a biblical belief." 


The Church forces the "Trinity" into the Bible:

"Do you covet that they will believe in you when [in fact] a party of them used to hear the Word of Allah then they would distort it knowingly after they had understood it?" [Holy Qur'an 2:75]

"Then woe to those who write the Scripture with their own hands and then say: 'This is from Allah', to traffic with it for a miserable price. Woe to them for what their hands do write and for the gain they make thereby" [Holy Qur'an  2:79]

"The text about the three heavenly witnesses (I John 5:7 KJV) is not an authentic part of the NT" (The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Vol. 4, p.711, Abingdon Press.)

"1 John 5:7 in the KJV reads: 'There are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one' but this is an interpolation of which there is no trace before the late fourth century." (The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Vol. 4, p. 871, Abingdon Press.)

"1 John 5:7 in the Textus Receptus (represented in the KJV) makes it appear that John had arrived at the doctrine of the trinity in explicit form ('the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost'), but this text is clearly an interpolation since no genuine Greek manuscript contains it" (The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary, Edited by Allen C. Myers, p. 1020)

Peake's Commentary on the Bible says:

"The famous interpolation after 'three witnesses' is not printed even in RSVn, and rightly. It cites the heavenly testimony of the Father, the logos, and the Holy Spirit, but is never used in the early Trinitarian controversies. No respectable Greek MS contains it. Appearing first in a late 4th-cent. Latin text, it entered the Vulgate and finally the NT of Erasmus."

"For God is not the author of confusion," [1 Corinthians 14:33]

"And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness" [2 Thessalonians 2:10-12]


Who did the disciples call 'God'?

"As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol [is] nothing in the world, and that [there is] none other God but one. For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) But to us [there is but] one God, the Father, of whom [are] all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom [are] all things, and we by him." [1 Corinthians 8:4-6]

Here we have it in black and white! The disciples knew of only one God. But who was that God?

Did they say "one God, Jesus"? No!
Did they say "one God, the Son"? No!
Did they say "one God, the Holy Ghost"? No!
Did they say "one God, the trinity"? No!
Did they say "one God, the Father Son and Holy Ghost"? No!
They said "one God, THE FATHER"? PERIOD!!!

For those who attempt to put "hidden meanings" in the disciples mouths or to try and say the the reference to Jesus as "lord" means that he too is God then this is clearly in contradiction with the following verses:

"That ye may with one mind [and] one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." Romans 15:6

"Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord." [1 Timothy 1:2]

…etc.

So where did they disciples get the notion that God is one and Jesus (pbuh) is only a messenger of God? They got it from Jesus (pbuh) himself. He said:

"And this is life eternal, that they might know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent." [John 17:3]

"Jesus saith unto her, ...I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God." [John 20:17]


"Surely they have disbelieved who say: 'Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary.' But the Messiah said: 'O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.' Verily, whosoever sets up partners in worship with Allah then Allah has forbidden Paradise upon him, and his abode is the Fire. And for the unjust there are no allys" [Holy Qur'an 5:72]


 e-mail: prince_zedz@hotmail.com
© 2001 (Zed). All rights reserved.







Contents

Home

Common links

Is the Bible God's Word?

Divinity of Jesus Christ

Divine Sonship of Jesus Christ

Crucifixion Or Cruci-Fiction

Muhammad (pbuh) in the Bible

Atonement and original sin

Paul and his teachings

Al-Qur'an - A miracle of miracles

Proof of Prophethood

Miracles of Muhammad (pbuh)

Mercy for all creation

Jesus (pbuh) in the Qur'an

View and read about miracles in nature

Women in Christianity

Women in Islam

Other articles

Links

 

Islam and Christianity Forum